Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Spousal Health Care Options


Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe that they are but usually just generic. My wife prefers brand

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think you got bad info from OPM about suspending coverage on your wife but not on yourself. If you change to "Self Only" coverage how can OPM stop you? This does not make sense. They are telling you all or nothing. I would call NARFE and ask about this business. NARFE is advocate group for retired federal employees. I am a member and pay the dues. This just does not jive with what I have read in NARFE. These OPM, SSA, VA people will tell you anything. This is what frightens me about my wife and survivor benefits. They will tell your survivor you are not entitled to DIC or survivor benefit just out of ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

I hope you are right. I will check and let you know what I find out.

Thanks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

I found the following info on OPM.gov under FAQ- Insurance- Tricare, Champva, and Tricare for Life:

Question: "Can an annuitant, survivor, or former spouse suspend his or her family members' s FEHB coverage while remaining covered under the FEHB program?"

Answer: "No. An annuitant, survivor, or former spouse can change to self only coverage, but this cancels all family members' coverage and takes away their future enrollment eligibility."

John, the above info goes along with what I was previously told. This is directly from the OPM website. As a result of this stupid OPM rule, once she turns 65 my wife will have coverage with Champva, Medicare A & B, and Blue Cross federal. We will be paying extra premium cost with Blue Cross for coverage she doesn't really need. Like I said in my previous post, I am afraid to take any action which would outright cancel her FEHB coverage because you never know what may happen in the future with medicare or Champva.

A little good news is the self plus one FEHB option will be avaiable during open season at the end of next year and will be effective January 1, 2016. Hopefully, switching from family coverage to self plus one coverage will lower my premiums.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I understand your fear of losing all future coverage for your spouse under OPM. I will call NARFE and ask them about this rule. I thought that if you suspended family coverage you could get it back during open season. Hey, the self plus one coverage sounds good to me. I can't understand why we who have medicare as primary must pay as much as those who have BC as primary. We are being screwed on behalf of all those employees who have cheap FEHB. You know 40% of my pension goes to pay for BC family plan. This is totally unfair and an injustice. NARFE needs to get onto this problem. Since FERS federal employment begins to suck. If my wife kept insurance from OPM after I croaked most of her survivor benefit would go to pay just insurance. She only would get 50% as it is of my pension and we are all paying for this out of our pensions by the 10% reduction to have survivor benefits.

Accurate facts are better than false good news. Thanks for your responses to this issue which affects many of us. You never know what will happen with FEHB either since it is re-negotiated in congress every few years. ChampVA is probably a better bet than FEHB. The public and congress hate federal employees thinking we were or are all overpaid and useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

You and I are in agreement. I sent you a response to your PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use