Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bva Traveling Board

Rate this question


chiefhouse00

Question

Greetings

How long does it normally take to get results from a traveling board judge? I meet a BVA Traveling Board on 16 Sep 2014. I haven't heard anything yet.

Best Regards
Chiefhouse

Best Regards

Chiefhouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Regarding time to decision, BVA keeps track of this and publishs it in it the BVA Chairman's annual report. You can find the reports here. When you look at time frames you see the typical shell game of when times are counted. Even though you file a VAF9 to the BVA the case stays at the RO for when you have a hearing. The time that it is at the RO-- two to three years-- is not counted as BVA having the case. BVA says that from the time of physical reciept of the file from the RO to decision is 235 days. The physical receipt language is more trickier in that I've seen it take up to six months for BVA to receive a file. Now that all files should be close to electronic, this delay should be taken out of the picture. So I would say that the average time is 235 days plus a couple of months for BVA to physically receive the file.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Greetings

I just received my BVA Decision Package on Friday 5 Jun 2015. DOCKET N0 11-12-911: Six of eight claims were REMANDED back to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction for further development…two claims were closed with no action taken. One of those two claims was for an increase in DMll for regulation of activities and episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring one or two hospitalizations. The RO denied the DMll claim increase even though the C&P exam (Nov 2014) he ordered check marked the box restricted activities; Tripler Medical Hospital Emergency Center Doctor on Duty annotated "restricted activities" in the release report,and my VA Provider for eight years wrote in her Notes, must comply with “restricted activities, yet the RO found a way to deny the DMll increase in Feb 2015. Everything is well documented. So, I’m confused with the events that have occurred in me trying to get fairness with the VA. What should I do next? Oh, I never received a transcript from my traveling BVA Board conducted in Sept 2014.

Best Regards

Chiefhouse

Best Regards

Chiefhouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Same here chief, remand back too RO on my EED NOD. Its only one item so who knows. My VA decision package look pretty good, the VLJ looked as if she is fighting for me like she did on my appeal which granted me IU. Remand better than a denial. Well let you know how things work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

well as I promise got EED back to 10/2010 on IU was asking for 8/2012 extra 12 months and the judge threw in vertigo which was denied back in 10/2011 as a gift ???? never ask for it . Soooo sent in NOD for EED with some paper showed effective date was incorrect and they gave me a better deal. So good luck all its been a 5 year fight but its done and now I will chill. Good luck chief. Never say never don't give up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I have had the best luck with claims at the DRO level. Once it gets to BVA, God only knows where it will end up. I had a traveling Board BVA some years ago on a CUE claim. The judge just took our information and the thing was over in 20 minutes. I had a lawyer do my brief. We lost. We appealed to Court of Vet Appeals. It was remanded back to BVA. We went back to Court. We lost. We went to federal court. The would not hear us. Now my lawyer and me are trying a new but related approach. This took 8 years. I started at the RO and went all the way to Federal Court. Once you leave the BVA it is war. Of course, it is war within the VA but benefit of doubt vanishes. Try to get your claim settled at the lowest possible level is my advice.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use