Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Can I Change My Vso During An Appeal Process Without Losing The Initial Appeal Date?

Rate this question


JFizzle

Question

I currently with the DAV as my claim representative and have an appeal that has been pending since 2009. Is it possible to transfer representatives (to a non DAV rep) without losing my appeal date. My claim according to ebenefits is still at claim received (1st stage).... in October, I requested for a video conference but the progress is still the same... 1st stage... any incite or advice, recommendations are welcomed.... thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You can change reps at any time without affecting anything else related to your claim. Notify your RO and the Board of Veterans Appeals via certified mail that you are changing your representation.

I can tell you from personal experience that if you hire an attorney, your VSO organization will drop you almost immediately after you inform them. You're at the Board, apparently. I'd recommend you hire a VA attorney while you can still submit additional evidence that an attorney may recommend you obtain prior to your hearing.

Are you saying that you filed your initial appeal to the Board in 2009?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You're going to get some real push back from your new VSO due to your appeal, they don't like to step in an appeal, but if you push they will. Just be sure the NEW VSO of choice is better suited to reping you than DAV. As far as loosing your place in line, what does DAV say your place is? You might want to find a VARO VSO that has had significant experience with BVA Video Hearings.

Why do you want to change VSOs at the 11th hour?

My VSO-rep never contacted me, nor returned my calls after my 6/08 claim. I finally switched 2011 with (2) NOD DRO Hearings (09 & 12) pending. The 09 DRO hearing finally took place 06/14. Really wouldn't say, the switching VSOs added any time but who really knows.

Semper Fi

Gastone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the responses.

Yes my initial appeal (still pending) was submitted in 2009. I have since then filed 2 new claims that have finished. Every time I would ask about this claim prior to my video conference request in October 2014, they tell me they do not know why the claim is still resting in the initial phase. I would do this twice a year.... it wasn't until I moved to a new state that my new DAV rep suggested a video appeal to maybe speed up the process.

I would like for the reps I am dealing with to be more proactive and informative as it relates to this delay for the initial review.

I remember asking DAV about switching and they told me I would lose my retro date and to give the process time..... 3 years later, pretty much in the same boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Your effective date is based on when you filed the claim and has nothing to do with who represents you. You can even choose to get rid of any VSO representation and represent yourself. As for what is going on at the Board, that's far too long for an appeal to be pending. I have filed a writ of mandamus under far less lengthy circumstances that got an appeal blasted out of the Appeals Management Center. I lost the writ because the VA finally did what I asked them to do, thus the writ became moot.

If you don't feel comfortable doing this on your own, I'd recommend you get an attorney to do it. If your Board appeal is denied and you need to then appeal in to the Court of Veterans Appeals, you will best be served by getting an attorney to handle that, anyway, so you might as well be one step ahead of the game. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You don't really need a VSO all you need is help here at hadit!

Be your own Advocate! however I Agree with lotzaspotz you need an attorney going in front of the BOARD.

jmo

....................Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use