Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

VA Choice Program is the same o same o

Rate this question


Pete53

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Please forgive me if I put this in wrong place but I am ashamed to admit new format baffles me.

 

On August 3rd VAMC Dallas informed me that the earliest Dermatology could see me was Oct 8th at 8 AM. I asked what about the 30 day wait list and getting outside appointment. The operator checked and siad I was eligible and said to call an 800 number in 5 to 10 business days. So I called August 11th Wednesday and they had nothing. I called VA and they said they had nothing so I called Patient Advocate and she said would check. She called me back in a couple of hours and told me that Head of Dermatology had not approved one person but my name would be sent up with a bunch of others.

 

I called today and nothing had changed so I call Directors Office and complained. By the way this all involver a half of dozen phone calls with long waits to talk to an operator or the clinics. My opinion is the Choice Program is a scam to make America think the wait list problem was fixed but nothing has changed.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

As I understand it - - The VA "Choice" program only works with physicians & medical facilities that have "signed up", and are on the "LIST".

There is a list of providers on the web, but who knows how accurate and up to date it is.

A provider that was previously used by the "Fee Paid" program must send in another batch of paperwork, agree

to whatever "Choice" thinks the service is worth to participate. This may be less than Medicare would pay.

Further, even when the services needed cannot be provided by a VA facility, at least a VA PCP must put in the originating request.

This causes even more delay.

As it stands, the "Choice" program is slated to go away, along with "Fee Paid", and other outside VA care programs.

Supposedly, they will be replaced with a "one size fits all" outside care scheme, no doubt to be set up to the VA's satisfaction, not veterans.

(Lots of administration, little actual services in a timely manner.)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The choice program is coming up in congress as soon as they come from vacation

a congressman from Georgia want the choice to be given to all Vets so we can get care

from outside providers and as it stand it might get approve. Even senator Mccain wants this after

Trump comment about he does nothing for the Vets.RU 

Edited by RUREADY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The choice program is coming up in congress as soon as they come from vacation

a congressman from Georgia want the choice to be given to all Vets so we can get care

from outside providers and as it stand it might get approve. Even senator Mccain wants this after

Trump comment about he does nothing for the Vets.RU 

For decades, the politicians regarded spending money on the VA and particularly veterans as a necessary evil, and to be minimized whenever possible.

I remember a re-enlistment "contract" forced on those in the reserves in the 1970's. Basically, it eliminated several benefits that were regarded as important by

those in the reserves and who would eventually become veterans.

Anyway, the majority of the blame for the VA's current horrible reputation, behavior, and actually unlawful behavior can be put on the Congress, past an present.

The party in power certainly also had some bearing, but the situation did not really change much, even if congress and the administration did.

To me, a percentage of the war related expenditures by the government should be automatically set aside to pay for the "hidden costs" of war as it relates to veterans.

Further I see so much administrative waste and other serious problems in the present VA vs Medicare scheme that, in fact, extract money from veterans for services that a veteran has already paid in full for.   Naturally, it's all legal, thanks to clauses in the military service enlistment and appointment documents that allow the government unilateral power to change the terms at any time.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I am just trying to get benefits that's due but the problem is who we voted for

you can forget about the old ways of doing things at VA , just get familiar with the new system

or we can stay in the old and it will always be that OLD ways of doing things. No disrespect

Chuck75 but its jmho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use