Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Reconsideration at the VARO is legitimate

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

I ran across this in m21-1 Part 3. According to this recently updated information a request for reconsideration is a viable choice at the regional level. 

Section F.  Requests for Reconsideration

1.  Requests for Reconsideration

 
Introduction
This topic contains information on claims for reconsideration, including 
 
·   definition of a request for reconsideration
·   initial steps for handling a request for reconsideration
·   effective dates for requests for reconsideration of  increased evaluation
·   determining whether to include appeal rights in the decision notice, and
·   letter to a claimant who provides no evidence, or evidence VA has already considered, in support of a request for reconsideration.
 
Change Date
July 15, 2015
 
a.  Definition:  Request  for Reconsideration
For the purpose of this topic, a request for reconsideration is a request from a claimant for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to reconsider one of its decisions that has not yet become final (the one-year appeal period, which begins on the date the claimant was notified of the decision at issue, has not yet expired).  A prescribed form is notrequired for a request for reconsideration.
 
A request for reconsideration differs from a claim to reopen in that the decision at issue in a claim to reopen has become final.
 
Reference:  For more information about claims to reopen a finally denied claim, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 2.D.
 
b.  Initial Steps for Handling a Request  for Reconsideration
The table below describes the initial steps for handling a request for reconsideration
 
If the claimant submits ...
Then ...
evidence VA has never before considered
refer the claim to either the rating activity or authorization activity (whichever made the decision at issue) for reconsideration.
no evidence but makes reference to available evidence that VA has never before considered
assist the claimant in obtaining the evidence.
 
Note:  Follow the applicable instructions in this table once VA receives the evidence.
 
Reference:  For information about assisting claimants in obtaining evidence to support their claim, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart iii, 1.C.1, 2, and 3.
a statement indicating a  willingness to report for examination(s) after failing to report to a previously scheduled exam(s)
reorder the missed examination(s).
·   no evidence, or
·   evidence VA has already considered
send the claimant the letter shown in M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 2.F.1.e.
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It has always been legit James, but the only regulations for re considerations were within the BVA regulations.

What is good for the BVA is good for the RO and many vets have filed for reconsiderations at the RO level prior to these regulations coming out.

Since the BVA has a reconsideration method ( on back of each I-9 form), the RO still falls under the same 38 USC/CFR.

This type of request however does NOT stop the one year NOD clock.

I filed for one in around 2005 when they denied a 3 part CUE claim I had on a 1998 decision.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

As I recall, there was a fair amount of discussion regarding the 07/15 M21 change, back in late 15, here on Hadit. The fact that the Official "RFC" filing, however  & whenever done, did not stop the NOD Clock; was the big take away.

To this date, I am not aware of any Hadit Postings, indicating a Vet had is Denial reversed based on a successful Official "RFR" outcome. Worth a try, but you better submit an actual piece of N & M Evidence, that is absolute GOLD.

A question comes to mind, besides possibly adding some time to your actual appeal, does the timing of filing of the "RFR" or the NOD affect one another? Does filing the NOD, cancel the "RFR?"

 Whatever a Vet decided to do, DO NOT MISS THE NOD FILING DEADLINE!!!!!!!!!!

Semper Fi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

The main wording in this subject is

''The Effective Dates''

   effective dates for requests for reconsideration of  increased evaluation
·   determining whether to include appeal rights in the decision notice, and
·   letter to a claimant who provides no evidence, or evidence VA has already considered, in support of a request for reconsideration.
 
jmo
 
................Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 

I submitted my NOD along with my request for reconsideration and N/M evidence on the 29th of January, well within the one year deadline. I agree, if the reconsideration produces a favorable decision it will have saved some time. If denied, it will add some time before it will be certified to the board. I am thinking that it is worth a try as it is a pretty well cut and dried claim. Only time will tell.

Hopefully, If the claim eventually does go to the BVA some kind of reform will be put into play between now and then to fix the broken system. I hope that time is on my side, but then we never know. I am content, confident and have well learned over time the virtue of patience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, jamescripps2 said:

 

I submitted my NOD along with my request for reconsideration and N/M evidence on the 29th of January, well within the one year deadline. I agree, if the reconsideration produces a favorable decision it will have saved some time. If denied, it will add some time before it will be certified to the board. I am thinking that it is worth a try as it is a pretty well cut and dried claim. Only time will tell.

Hopefully, If the claim eventually does go to the BVA some kind of reform will be put into play between now and then to fix the broken system. I hope that time is on my side, but then we never know. I am content, confident and have well learned over time the virtue of patience.

James the problem you face is what will VA do. We all know that VA is not veteran friendly and I have seen VA process the veteran's NOD and completely ignore the veteran's request for reconsideration.  I am not trying to be a downer, just trying to let you know that it is a lot easier for VA to look at that NOD instead of the reconsideration. It even happened to me, in which I finally got a denial and had to appeal and finally won my service connection.  By VA processing the NOD it gives VA more time to screw things up. 

Hope the best

P. S. I have also won a different claim requesting VA to reconsider within the NOD time frame but I eventually had to file a NOD because VA screwed up the effective date on that claim too. So in my experience it is still a major problem at the local RO level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use