Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

CUE DECISION AWARDED FROM NOD

Rate this question


Storm

Question

Good Evening Everyone,

 

      Happy New Year to everyone, I was shocked but I now I have more to go.  Heres the decision :

                               

                                                                                            INTRODUCTION

 

            The records reflect that you are a veteran of the Gulf War Era and Peacetime. You served in the Army from February 1986 toJuly 1986 and from September 20,1990  to July 4 1991. We received a Notice of Disagreement from you on February 8,2016 about one or more of our earlier decisions.  Based on a review of the evidence listed below, we have made the following decision(s) on your claim. 

                                                                                                 DECISION

              Entitlement an earlier effective date for service connection of post traumatic stress disorder (previously claimed as dysthymic disorder) is granted because of and clear and unmistakable error was made; therefore, a 50 percent evaluation is assigned effective September 3, 2012.

 

              Entitlement ton an earlier date for service connection of post traumatic stress disorder(previously claimed as dysthymia disorder) is granted because of a clear and unmistakable error was made in assigning an effective date of February 3,2014,the date of receipt of VA form 21-526EZ Fully Developed Claim was received; therefore, a 50 percent evaluation is assigned effective September 3, 2013, the date of receipt of your claim for PTSD.  You were denied service connection for PTSD in the rating decision of October 21, 2013 because you did not attend your exam.  You advised us on February 4,2014 that you missed your exam due to a conflict in your schedule, but were willing to report for VA exam. You reported for VA exam on November 10,2014, were diagnosed with PTSD, granted service connection in the rating decision of January 31,2015, notified of that decision on February 9, 2015.  February 8, 2016 we received your Notice of Disagreement in which you stated you believe you should be granted PTSD back to 1995. Please be advised the claim for PTSD received September 8, 1995(error it was AUG) resulted in a VA exam that did. not have a diagnosis of PTSD, you were diagnosed with dysthymic disorder claimed as PTSD; you were notified of that decision on October 2,2002.  You did not appeal that decision and it thus became final October 2,2003. one year from the October 2, 2002 notification letter advising you that dysthymic disorder was not service connected.  This decision is now final as the one year appeal period has expired.  It was not until your most current VA exam that PTSD was diagnosed and related to service, As stated the proper effective date is September 3, 2012 as the claim received on the date has been continuously prosecuted from that date and thus did not become final.

 

  Please feel free to chime in on anything because although, I'm happy and grateful for my award  and the VA Cueing its self. I can't be shake the feeling of still going for a CUE back to 1995. They admitted in the decision. Dysthymic Disorder PTSD.  And on my DD214/15 all my SWA Medal,National Defense, Liberation of Kuwait Medal didn't ring a bell in the initial denial back in 1995. 

I apologize if I posted in the wrong topic before sorry.

                                                                                                                                     Thank you

                                                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

 

Wow Berta, Thank you. I'm going this week to request the file. Just spoke to a gentleman he told me to request FOIA. I realized it was different. But didn't know they used sheets. In my medical record they said there's a diagnoses from Dr.XX and its says I was DX with dysthymic disorder at the time of the Compensation and Pension evaluation. I need to see it. I have the copy here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If the VA had made a NSC rating and given a diagnostic code on the older denial..and also had evidence in their possession ( from your SMRs) that this was potentially PTSD ,it would be easier to find their legal error.

 

I have been reading as much as I can at BVA and even the CAVC site regarding your situation...and am wondering if this should be a claim involving 38 CFR 3.156.....

Did you mention or were you even asked what your stressor was in the older C & P exam?

Obviously the VA has conceded stressor with the PTSD award you have now -so maybe they overlooked something .....maybe in your STRs or Personnel file? Or in the C & P exam report?

Have you googled the Dr.XXXX  to see of he is really a MH professional?

I hope his full name appears somewhere.....for all we know he might be a podiatrist.

In 1995 they were still asking vets claiming PTSD for descriptions of their stressors, but this was before the 2000 VCAA.My point is they should have asked for that info before the 1998 C & P exam.

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta,  I found the doctor. He's a psych Neuro advisor to Patrick Kennedy.  I also have to look in the Persian Gulf Registry. I took a lot of tests. Also this info was written on another record sign off by a neuropsychologist.  I was researching you old stuff  in the appeal section and I saw u correct a guy about that 38 CFR. Law. He used it for the SOC  Form 9 AND NOD. That's what I was thinking. They made the same error in my SOC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

That dysthymic disorder DX is the VA trying to get out of PTSD dx IMO.     Did you get compensated for it?   When I want for first rating in 1972 the VA said I had schizophrenia  that was only mildly related to Vietnam service etc.   What they were saying was when I enlisted three years earlier I was schizophrenic, but fine military doctors just missed it up until I came home from Vietnam and started to have classic PTSD symptoms.   There was no such DX as PTSD in those days so they just said  "vet has anti-social PD and schizophrenia"  give him 10%.  I do remember VA gave me MMPI and were so alarmed by results the doctor who gave the test did not want to see me again.  I told him all I saw were pools of blood when they gave me Ink Blot test.  They actually used to do that back in the day.  From that day back in 1972 I knew I was at war with VARO and VA system in general and that they were taking no prisoners.  To keep my compensation low they were willing to destroy my reputation and standing when I went to try and get federal job.  My DD-214 had a spin code that said I was a  sociopath.  This goes over big with perspective employers if they look at dd-214.  I got all that changed but even after I got discharge upgrade to full honorable the spin code remained identifying me as nut job with non -existent criminal tendencies.  This was the grossest kind of libel and slander.  I should have sued them but I did not know enough and someone else did it for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Storm

 

                  I got 70% for schizophrenia, bipolar, PTSD and a bunch of other things.   The VA just would not concede a 100% rating, but I got TDIU and since then I got about 80% of other individual combined ratings.  So I got TDIU P&T in 2002 and then SMC "S" in 2008.  It took me thirty years to go from 10% to 30% to 70% to TDIU to P&T and a few more years to get "S".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Storm, you said:

 " I found the doctor. He's a psych Neuro advisor to Patrick Kennedy.  I also have to look in the Persian Gulf Registry. I took a lot of tests. Also this info was written on another record sign off by a neuropsychologist. "

I hope those test results got into your medical records.The VA gave my husband numerous tests over a 2 day period to determine his level of PTSD (was at 30%) and then to determine his level of disability due to a 1151 stroke. The results showed 100% PTSD  as well as total and permanent disability due to the 1151 stroke.

The RO ignored the tests and never mentioned them in a denial,after he died, and by then they knew he was on SSDI but failed to obtain the SSA records, his SSA awards were critical to his 2 claims,that  I was claimant on after he died.

I went right over to the VAMC when I got the denial and his psychologist told me he knew the VA had the results, but he gave me a copy too, and also wrote VA a letter as to these  tests results and the fact that he had seen my husband';s SSA awards because I brought them with me.

(One SSA  award solely for the stroke, which we filed reconsideration on with SSA, which produced a SSA award solely for his PTSD with a very favorable effective date.)

Within a few months, they posthumously awarded 100% SC P & T for PTSD (1997) with EED of 1991 and 

due to a CUE I filed on a 1998 decision,they awarded 100% P & T under 1151 for his stroke, in 2012.

My point is that those test results could have been critical to your original PTSD claim.Maybe they even contained the PTSD diagnosis.

The VA is very good at ignoring critical evidence. They have done that to me for every claim I have filed...even the most recent one last year....when not only the director, by phone and email but also an additional VARO employee who told me by phone that he had my 5103 where I listed the evidence they had

- a VACO Medical opinion- all the evidence I needed  and that he would give it to a doctor right away for an opinion. They ignored the VACO opinion AGAIN, I raised hell and CUE,via fax and IRIS, and then the award letter was in the mail very fast.

Men and women! This is what VA will do to your spouse, when you die, if your spouse is not up to speed on a lot of this VA stuff. I am sure many grief stricken widows/widowers just want to walk away.Because they will do this crap as soon as they get the DIC claim,unless the grant of benefits is very obvious (like 10 years continuous 100 % P & T)

There is a widow's recent topic here I am going to link everyone to later today.....to show not only how proactive we all must be with decisions we get, but also how important it is for our survivors to be on the ball.

And of course they will do this to any veteran as well as a survivor.....if they feel they can get away with it...

If any of your probative evidence is not listed in their evidence list on a decision....that means ,as likely as not, that VA did receive it, but chose not to even read it.

Probative evidence like IMOs.......the BVA was the only VA entity to read my DMII death IMOs....

This VA crap does not happen in a Vacuum, it is deliberate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use