Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Thoughts on change to IU at retirement age??

Rate this question


wisconsinwalter

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
On 5/29/2017 at 5:46 PM, Buck52 said:

Right now as it stands this is only a proposal

 but this is why veterans should always file as many claims as he/ her or can  to boost up his rating past the 100% scheduler.

''VA VLB Attorney Chris Attig''has mention many times why Veterans that get IU from a combined disability but does not reach the 100% but can't work due to their S.C. Disability at what ever % they recieved  say 70%combined rating and the VA Inferred the veteran for TDIU P&T But paid at the 100% And no Future Exams scheduled, if this is his only rating  then this is who they will come after (in my opinion) from what I read...that veteran is still consider 90% using the extra scheduler CFR 38 4.16/4.17 (b)

§4.17a   Misconduct etiology.

A permanent and total disability rating under the provisions of §§4.15, 4.16 and 4.17 will not be precluded by reason of the coexistence of misconduct disability when:

(a) A veteran, regardless of employment status, also has innocently acquired 100 percent disability, or

(b) Where unemployable, the veteran has other disabilities innocently acquired which meet the percentage requirements of §§4.16 and 4.17 and would render, in the judgment of the rating agency, the average person unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.

[40 FR 42536, Sept. 15, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 45349, Oct. 2, 1978]

you will still get the 90% rating $$  but its a lot less than 100%... the 38 CFR (b) is what they want to take away.

I personally don't see how they can go against the CFR's 38 (b) ????

So to fix this if the veteran has another S.C. Condition he/she can file a claim for and get a 60% or higher rating  then the veteran should be moot on the TDIU and given a 100% final degree on his/her rating and  be inferred to the SMC-S

This will put you at the final degree 100% scheduler rating.

As VLB Attorney Chris Attig mentions why a veteran needs to get more  higher ratings  or if on IU using the combined extra scheduler at 60% 70% 80% or  90% just in case a Proposal to reduce his current ratings.

Check out your Myhealthvet Notes under VA Problem List and try to remember if any of these conditions can be SERVICE CONNECTED?no matter how small or what it is if its a claim file on it.

If takes several so what file  claims& see what happens? of course you will need to prove it happen while in the service  but it will raise your current ratings and maybe moot the IU.

 

jmo

Well put Buck thank you..

 

Elk Hunt Test #65_14_Gerstle River Test Site_Landbase Test_Ft. Greely AK. 1964_S.R.#99_06

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything

the American public believes is false."-- William Casey, CIA Director!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
On 6/2/2017 at 0:14 PM, jbasser said:

We did this show to bring awareness to a potential disaster scenario for veterans receiving IU and SSDI.

I have been predicting events like this over the past several years. The CBO is a think tank that always brainstorms ways to for the Government to save Money. They are also tasked with the financial side for Bills by giving estimated costs for all bills. Their recommendations are really interpeted into each congressional piece of legislation. This time Mulvaney has really proposed a budget that shows an increase to the Dept of veterans Affairs by adding to the VHA and taking from the VBA. The improvements are Choice Card, Hiring Doctors and No Choice Card extension. Anyone tried to use the choice card?  The cuts to the VBA are IU compensation when a Veteran reaches age 62. 

This is still in the Congress as of this morning. If someone said It had passed the house then there was mistake made. If I did say that I was wrong and Apologize to the audience. 

Now is the time to act to show your representatives that you do not agree with this Proposal. All of the Big Veterans Organizations are against it. 

This budget also indicates SSDI will also be cut as it is known by the politicians as a form of welfare according to Mulvaney.  This means if you are a disabled bet under 62 and receiving SSDI you will be re evaluated by the SSDI in an attempt to sever your benefits. 

Also keep in mind that the Political Structure in DC has changed and things like this are more likely to pass then they were in previous years.  

JBasser

Thank You JBasser we like to clear up any thing that might be of error.

Elk Hunt Test #65_14_Gerstle River Test Site_Landbase Test_Ft. Greely AK. 1964_S.R.#99_06

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything

the American public believes is false."-- William Casey, CIA Director!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I too called the President hotline and had a pleasant experience. Total talk hold was 24 mins. 10 on hold. It is to the Secretary office

I stand corrected on this not being the Presidents plan. I was informed it was. 

She said Shulkin came down to see what the prevailing issues were and this one was one of the most complained about. 

 

Shulkin is meeting with the President today and bringing it to his attn. 

thanks Marina53 for bring it up with the number. 

I also made a complaint about having to drop my knee replacement for a deal for P&T. 

A specialist is supposed to call me about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My appt is Thursday at 0900 at the CVSO. I don't hold much confidence in them based off of past results. I intend to file 6 more claims that I was told was moot or have developed as secondary issues. 

If they finally give me my stiff none flexible knee, that should get me over the top 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use