Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Need help with RBA correction

Rate this question


Lemuel

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder
I received the third response from the VA GC to the CAVC order to correct my RBA by replacing documents obviously missing and relevant in the RBA from the hard copy of my Medical File OPTR and IPTR maintained by the Medical Division.
  Apparently they were just dumped into contract warehouses without adequate record keeping when the VA finally computerized the Progress Notes and Examination Records.  The Pharmacy records and Lab records have been computerized since the late 1980s making it evident that there should be accompanying OPTR and IPTR to match that were requested and at one time in the Comp & Pen hard copy file but were not there when scanned into the computerized record.
It has now been over 45 days since the CAVC issued the Order to Correct the RBA to the Secretary.  I'm waiting for another 45 days to make it 90 days, 6 responses from the VA GC without the directed "status report" (only stating they are responding) before submitting a request for court ordered stipulations on what the missing records show.
 
Am I on track for this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

I think this is very, very very good news, since the CAVC normally just goes on the "Evidence of Record" aka RBA, and makes a decision, even tho the RBA may be inaccurate or incomplete.  This means that there might be a glimmer of accountability, so the VA in the 2 years or so it takes them to send our appeal to the BVA, could at least make sure the file is complete.  

And, its not suprising to have the VA "drag its feet" even tho the CAVC ordered them not to do that.  If I violate a "court order" then a warrent will be issued for my arrest.  When VA does it, there is no penalty, and in fact can actually repeat it multiple times for the same judge!!!!  

Now, remember, you CAN and have a obligation to help VA get applicable records.  So, if you have them, simply send them to CAVC, especially if you have pertinent evidence refuting the BVA denial!!!  

You are on trak, the only thing I suggest is send them the records yourself..this is your claim and your money..not some GS5's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
  1. I don't have the records.  My copies became paper machete in a flood.  What I have now I received from the VARO Cheyenne via copies of the hard copy C&P file when it was scanned.  It was grossly out of order with copious duplicates in such order that I believe the copying, scanning contractor in Denver padded their bill by running stacks through more than one time (based on the order of the documents in the boxes).
  2. I have some items from that file that were not included in the RBA.  I also have documents that are not included in the RBA and offered them to the VA GC's office.  I pointed out the documents that were on an earlier CD provided to me when the first CD sent to my attorney was missing a lot and I requested everything on file by CD.
  3. Have requested them from the FOIA officers repeatedly both from the Central Office and the originating VA Medical Facilities.  I'm attaching the order and the last response.  Do you think the response is responsive to the order.  I don't.  It doesn't say what has been done and no attachments showing any action has been taken other than writing a response.
  4. I will send the back up that I have that is not in the RBA with motions for court ordered stipulations by the secretary if the RBA cannot be corrected within the 21 days required for FOIA responses.  I've done all that I can to get the evidence needed to back up my claim.
  5. I'll post in March my additional effort.  I don't expect the VA GC to be able to accomplish the task.  The BVA Judge stated in the hearing, LOL.  The BVA isn't even able to get the old hard copy records from the Medical Division or the Records Management Office.
  6. Hopefully I can get a precedent setting decision that will spur the Secretary to come down on the Records Management Office and make them come up with the old originals of OPTR and IPTR records.
  7. 16 minutes ago, broncovet said:

    I think this is very, very very good news, since the CAVC normally just goes on the "Evidence of Record" aka RBA, and makes a decision, even tho the RBA may be inaccurate or incomplete.  This means that there might be a glimmer of accountability, so the VA in the 2 years or so it takes them to send our appeal to the BVA, could at least make sure the file is complete.  

    And, its not suprising to have the VA "drag its feet" even tho the CAVC ordered them not to do that.  If I violate a "court order" then a warrent will be issued for my arrest.  When VA does it, there is no penalty, and in fact can actually repeat it multiple times for the same judge!!!!  

    Now, remember, you CAN and have a obligation to help VA get applicable records.  So, if you have them, simply send them to CAVC, especially if you have pertinent evidence refuting the BVA denial!!!  

    You are on trak, the only thing I suggest is send them the records yourself..this is your claim and your money..not some GS5's.  

     

20171201 Clerk Order re RBA correction.pdf

20180117 VA re RBA dispute.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

You posted, 

Quote

 I pointed out the documents that were on an earlier CD provided to me when the first CD sent to my attorney was missing a lot and I requested everything on file by CD.

Then send those documents to the Court yourself.  Put the CD in your computer, then copy the applicable documents and send them to them, OR, copy the CD and send them the cd if they accept CD's.  (I dont know this).  

Back in 2008, I discovered I was one of many Veterans, that had missing (shredded) evidence, and I submitted a "Special Handling Request due to mishandled evidence".  The VA shreded That EVIDENCE, ALSO, A FEW YEARS LATER.  

You have your work cut out for you.  Be proactive and get those documents yourself, if they are probative.  (that is, if they are medical records where the doc gave you a nexus, for exxample).  

Go to your VAMC "release of information" and ask them for a copy of your medical records.  They should provide same.  

If there is important evidence that is not VAMC, then go to that doctors office, obtain a copy and send it in.  

Given that the VA has essentially admitted your evidence was lost, you should have the benefit of the doubt (oops, you dont get that at CAVC).  However, your testimony that you sent in x document should suffice as the VA wont have a copy to testify against you.  Its true that VA is given a presumption, but you have a great rebut of that presumption, given the court ordered VA to come up with the records.  Let me know how this comess out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Fortunately the FOIA requests that were ignored are in the RBA.  Even the Records Management Center continued the non-denial, denial which I complained about, by sending me another copy of the C&P file instead of the Medical File.

I've downloaded all of the recent, (since computerization) from the blue button.  Only a few records are absent because of the software used at particular VA Medical facilities.  I don't think any of the missing computerized documents are probative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

But a 5 month treatment in a seizure clinic is probative for SC of seizures secondary to a TBI.  Especially with a 3.154 claim for negligent refusal to change medication from Tegretol on complaints of the medication making the symptoms worse as is stated in the current PDR.  Haven't seen a 1990 PDR but Tegretol had been in the formulary covered by the PDR for 28 years by that time.  The contraindication should be recorded in the 1990 PDR also.

I think I have a slam dunk on this one.  Perhaps even with just the confirmation during hospitalization for an MVA for two days observation and the pharmaceutical record of having the prescriptions for Tegretol.  But there should be notes of my complaints about the medication in the Seizure Clinic OPTR.

There are also pre MVA EEGs showing epileptiform spiking and sharp waves with or without seizures.

Edited by Lemuel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use