Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Copy of DBQ. Looking for insight?

Rate this question


chriscond

Question

Im currently service connected at 50% for panic with anxiety and depression. This is for an increased rating. I'm not working right now and receive SSDI. I applied for an increase in 2016 and was kept at 50%. I didn't pursue it further because I felt like their reasoning was sound. This time I know things have gotten worse and will appeal it to the full extent necessary. Any thoughts would be helpful.

 

----------------

Axis 1: Panic Disorder, Bipolar II disorder
Axis 2: None
Axis 3: Chronic Pain due to facial trauma
Axis 4: Problems in realtionships
Axis 5: 32

Occupational and Social Impairment:
Occupational and social impairment with deficincies in most areas

Symptoms:
The ones that were checked are Depressed Mood, Anxiety. Suspiciousness, Panic Attacks more than once a week, Impaired Judgment, Disturbances of motivation and mood, Difficulty establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships. difficulty adapting to stressful circumstances including work or its setting, suicidal ideation, persistent danger of hurting self or others, neglect of personal appearance and hygiene, intermittent ability to perform activities of daily living, including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene.

The notes were very thorough throughout the DBQ as well. In the remarks section there is a lot of writing but basically says that I'm currently unable to show stabilization in mood, frequently depressed with avoidance of family friends and self care. Instability due to panic affect ability to participate at times in public events and pursuing work due to high levels of agitation and panic when overwhelmed. Periods of SI with one SA. Self harm, Impulsiveness, Lack of emotional regulation leads to weekly and at times daily conflict with partner and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 1

Even if you currently have a New Claim or Appeals Decision pending, when a New Or possible Secondary SC Issue presents, FILE the Claim. Let the VA Rater sort out your supporting evidence.

The above recommendation does not hold true for an Old Vet sitting back and hoping his SC T & P won't get a Review. Filing a Claim for SC or Increase opens all Ratings for a possible review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Have you filed for the Increase?  The Date of the DBQ responses posted above is? Was this DBQ a result of a C & P Exam?

Much easier if you post redacted copies of all  C & P DBQs and both Award and Denial Letters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
13 minutes ago, Gastone said:

Have you filed for the Increase?  The Date of the DBQ responses posted above is? Was this DBQ a result of a C & P Exam?

Much easier if you post redacted copies of all  C & P DBQs and both Award and Denial Letters.

I have an intent to file with the VA that was initiated in August 2017. I initiated that after I took some psychological exam tests at a Psychologists office (MMPI i believe) and it showed severe limitations (i already knew that but the VA wanted it done so whatever) due to anxiety/depression, etc. 

The DBQ was done by my personal provider. The date of the DBQ is February 20th 2018. My VSO told me if I could get my own provider to fill the DBQ out with a copy of all of my records they would send it in as a Decision Ready Claim and hopefully get a decision one way or the other within the next couple months. I'll be giving that to her (VSO) within the week when I see her next.

I don't know where my Award letter and previous denial for increase are at the moment. I do remember the denial saying that I was staying at 50% and while there were a "couple" of criteria from the 70% met, the preponderance of the record more approximarted 50%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

VA Rater's are reluctant to accept private MH DBQ's as the final word for most MH Issues.

Considering you had a MH  Increase Denial (2016/17), I would expect a VA VMC or Contract MH C & P.

Did you NOD the Increase Denial, what's the 12-month Appeal cutoff date?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
20 minutes ago, Gastone said:

VA Rater's are reluctant to accept private MH DBQ's as the final word for most MH Issues.

Considering you had a MH  Increase Denial (2016/17), I would expect a VA VMC or Contract MH C & P.

Did you NOD the Increase Denial, what's the 12-month Appeal cutoff date?

It's a private provider but paid for by the VA. I'm also seen by a VA provider who says basically the same thing in her notes.

The denial I received was in 2016 but it stemmed from seeking an increase in 2013. Since that time I suffered a brutal assault  (jaw fractures on both sides, had to have titanium plates and screws put into my face and I was wired shut for 6 weeks). That all happened because I was trying to do exposure therapy like my providers wanted me to..Diagnosed TBI from that. Since then things have gone down hill emotionally. 

I'm well beyond the 12 month appeal cutoff date. In fact, the denial in 2016 was a denial by a DRO  from an original denial in 2014. My next step would have been to take it to an ALJ. 

Yeah I was thinking they'd probably schedule for a C&P anyway, was just hoping they wouldn't. Well, bring it on I guess. 

Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Did you file a New Secondary Claim linking the TBI & Residuals to you SC MH condition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use