Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&P for increase

Rate this question


Navy4life

Question

Hi there!  Long time member but haven't been around in awhile.  I filed for an increase for PTSD in April 2018.  Received C&P last week and my rep called me today to let me know I went to 70% from 50%.  My overall 90% rating stays the same but it puts me at 94% now.  I intend to file for one more claim in the next few months and if that goes well, I will go to 100%.

My C&P exam went well.  It was about 30 minutes total but examiner told me I was progressively getting worse.  Not sure I wanted to hear that but it's the truth.  I am in therapy for over four years now and I am mentally exhausted from it.  I just hate feeling like this all the time.

What I wanted to mention is that you should always wait until the decision is completed and not try to guess your outcome.  My rep was able to read the exam, it was done at an LHI contracted facility and while the examiner checked the box for 30% under Occupational and Social Impairment, his remarks and overall assessment are what increased me to 70%.  My point is to not always freak out and think you might get reduced based on the Occupational/Social Impairment box.  The entire C&P exam, along with all your history of therapy is what will help you in the end.

 

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
8 minutes ago, burnedoutvet said:

I don't even read C&Ps anymore or care for anything except my decision letters. 

Yeah I learned a long time ago to not worry about them. This one with a contracted facility too. My rep was able to see the exam in the system on Friday. While it concerned me that the 30% box was checked, the overall comments sounded in my favor. Plus my experience from the past, I know that isn’t what the rarer basis their decision on. 

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I think its okay to see the C and P exams but remember:

Worry never robs tommorrow of its sorrow, only today of its happiness.  

Think in terms os "actionables".  What "action" can you take to fend off an unfavorable c and p exam?  There are several actionables, such as challenge the exam, get an IMO, IME, etc.  

Sometimes the best "action" is to do nother, or at least wait.  It isnt a good idea to intervene at every step because sometimes the things we view as a problem are not one at all for the VA.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Exactly!  Too many times I see Veterans that freak out over a C&P exam and want to contact the doctor and tell them what they wrote was wrong and want them to change it but in all reality what they did right was okay and favorable.  Not all C&P exams are favorable, I get it but you have to wait for the final decision to then move forward with an appeal, if it is even needed.  I learned long time ago, NOT to read the C&P exams.  That is just what works for me.  If I had seen this most recent C&P exam for me, I too would have freaked out and it would have been for nothing.

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

A lot of times in my opinion it depends on what the C&P Was for &what type of examiner we get,  just a General C&P you just go in there and answer the Examiner questions and just see how he conducts the exam....Most Veterans are not stupid and can see and tell when there getting a worthless examiner and can half way expect a botched up C&P & yeah it (usually means denial)

And some times we can prepare our self for a Botch C&P  by asking questions to the examiner and making sure he has read a certain favorable part of your evidence   by say something like  Sir Excuse me did you read the part about Dr Smith commentary,? He is the urologist specialist that eaminne me and gave his professional opinion? if the examiner says no then ask him to find that part and read it , it should be of records so you should see it on your computer...or something close to this what ever the case may be  ect,,ect,,, just be nice is all you need to do.

if veteran  gets one of these type examiners then is the time to do something about it but some times the examiner will ignore our request.

Again usually a denial is in store  so don't be surprised when you get it in the mail  just be prepared for your next Move.

  So After denied  send in NOD on time, ask for Review of records on your denial claim(DRO Review/or Hearing at your R.O.... its unfortunate that we will need a rebuttal from a Private Doc  (IMO) but that's the game the VA Plays  We just have to be better at than them.

  its always best to get your claim solved at your RO Level and not have to get in the  long line of Appeals.(obviously)

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I think its okay to see the C and P exams but remember:

Worry never robs tommorrow of its sorrow, only today of its happiness.  

Think in terms os "actionables".  What "action" can you take to fend off an unfavorable c and p exam?  There are several actionables, such as challenge the exam, get an IMO, IME, etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use