Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

To RAMP or legacy appeal?

Rate this question

autumn

Asked by autumn,

 Share

Question

autumn Proficient

autumn

Posted
Posted

recently one of my claims was denied and attorney is appealing it. the VA C&P agreed with the claim and attorney mentioned the denial was bogus/bs.  pretty sure that was at the DRO level. 

attorney asked me if i want to RAMP this appeal or legacy appeal.  we already waited almost 3yrs when this denial came in and likely another ~3 years when it is legacy appealed, not  on the RAMP system. my understanding is we don't lose appeal power going with RAMP, is that correct?  attorney isn't getting worse results with RAMP than say the legacy appeal way i'm told.  before i green light RAMP i want to ask, are veterans choosing the RAMP path now & finding it worth it say vs the legacy appeals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Popular Posts

autumn
autumn

recently one of my claims was denied and attorney is appealing it. the VA C&P agreed with the claim and attorney mentioned the denial was bogus/bs.  pretty sure that was at the DRO level.  at

JKWilliamsSr
JKWilliamsSr

I saw it from this thread I guess a lot may have to do with interpretation so I guess we may have to see what happens when the rule goes into affect.  I am not sure of the VA can make new rules

FormerMember
FormerMember

On February 19th, the pathway to the BVA RAMP opens. I have 6 clients I'm putting into the process. Many are CUE claims. Obviously, if you claim a CUE in 1970 or 1993 as I am for my clients, they cann

38 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
vetquest Veteran

vetquest

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Berta said:

Beginning Feb. 19, Veterans who appeal a VA decision will have three decision review choices: Higher-Level Review, Supplemental Claim, and appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. VA will now offer Veterans greater choice in how VA reviews their claim is committed to ensuring the claims process is accurate, timely and fair. 

Am I reading this right?  I can use the legacy system and have access to the BVA but if I go with higher level review or supplemental claim I do not have access to the BVA.  That would be a crime against veterans as the RO's are messing veterans over and it is only at the BVA that claims are correctly adjudicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Berta

Berta

Posted
Posted

The links in the Press Release above offer a lot more info but I agree that it appears one cannot get to the BVA if they choose Higher level review or supplemental claim- in the Press Release-

hopefully vet lawyers out there will provide a better explanation of that- it will sure affect them negatively- as well as claimants ,if that is true.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
autumn Proficient

autumn

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/15/2019 at 7:39 AM, Berta said:

https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5203

I am glad AskNod mentioned CUEs he has pending. I have 4 or 5 pending.

I agree that CUE cannot get an "artificial hair cut."

They would have to re -write CUE regs.

The  evidence for 3 of the CUEs comes from an Office of General Counsel Pres op-the other evidence is basic VA case law.

 

 

 

 

 

glad you posed that. i have a few pending myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
OldJoe Community Regular

OldJoe

Posted
Posted

OK, now I am both confused and scared...

I was just contacted by the DAV in St Louis that the VA needed clarification if I was going to go the "supplemental" route because they were combining my appeals.  One of which is for a denial for a CUE, the other is for secondary condition relating knees to back.

The CUE is a classic textbook of what a CUE is defined as.  VA did a classic denial of my CUE without even reading the supporting material (couldn't have, the it was as plain as day, exactly the way the regs spell it out).

My other is for my on going appeal (NoD) for my knee which they are in the process of denying my appeal.  Their specialist outweighs the nurse practitioner that wrote one of nexus letters for weakness in my lower legs (claim for knees, lack of flexion and all that other medical lingo).  Though that said I have a letter from a specialist (Dr) concerning my knees and that the arthralgia may have been related to the military.

So, if they are working my CUE, they are not allowed to use any supplemental information...

But if they are working my knees they are using supplemental information.

Right now I have a call in to the nurse practitioner to get her letter rewritten or at least endorsed by a Dr. But because their records have it that they had the knee specialist write the letter they are kind of running around confused (I got her secretary straightened out and they found the original letter).

Man, why is my claim sounding more like a frigging soap opera staring the keystone cops as everything progresses forward.

 

Do I need to start waving arm and hands frantically to get things straightened out?  Is everything kosher? Or am I doomed to reenact the sinking of the Titanic?

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
autumn Proficient

autumn

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 2/20/2019 at 11:54 AM, OldJoe said:

OK, now I am both confused and scared... 

I was just contacted by the DAV in St Louis that the VA needed clarification if I was going to go the "supplemental" route because they were combining my appeals.  One of which is for a denial for a CUE, the other is for secondary condition relating knees to back.

[...]

i haven't been able to wrap my head around it either.  probably have irritated my attorney asking him many times recently about this too because of what i read on here regarding this.

i too have a few appeals in along with new appeal disputing the recent denial. though that appeal hasn't been submitted just yet due to change Feb 19 changes.  attorney was going "supplemental" path with that appeal last i heard.  yet, i haven't heard from attorney that if we go the "supplemental" path with appeal on recent denial VA will combine the other appeals in queue.

anyone know for sure, or we all flying blind for now with the new claims modernization rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 0
Galen Rogers Collaborator

Galen Rogers

Posted
Posted

Now that it is after Feb 19 Vets.gov says that how you file an appeal depends on the date of your decision.

For VA decisions we received on or after February 19, 2019  we are to use one of the three lanes.

  • Add new and relevant evidence (file a Supplemental Claim)
  • Ask for a new look from a senior reviewer (request a Higher-Level Review)
  • Appeal to a Veterans Law Judge (request a Board Appeal)

For VA decisions we received before February 19, 2019  we are to file a NOD.

Here's the page: https://www.va.gov/disability/file-an-appeal/

Not sure how many folks this affects but I imagine there are a few of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      RICHKAY
      RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Great Content
      pacmanx1
      pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • First Post
      czqiang1079
      czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Vicdamon12
      Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Panther8151
      Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in What is the DIC timeline?

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept