Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pulmonary Arterial hypertension Claim

Rate this question


ESE45

Question

Hi, has anyone put in a claim for pulmonary arterial hypertension and if so, how much had to be service connected?

I was diagnosed with PAH, 19 years after being discharged from the Navy, and was wondering what they look for in the claim.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi ESE45 Welcome. The VA uses its own definitions sometimes and other times they refuse to use common medical terms. For example, they call coronary heart disease, or hardening of the arteries, Ischemic Heart Disease. Why; who knows. No body uses IHD. I do believe that it is done on purpose sometimes just to confuse us, but that is my opinion. Anyway, to find your condition to determine what you might be rated for, go to https://militarydisabilitymadeeasy.com/  I couldn't find PAH specifically called out but it probably is covered in the early 7000 series. under a different condition name. If you really can't find it, you may need to get a medical person to help you figure out what is the term the VA is referring to. They may be able to help. That is all I can offer for your direct question. I will add however, that if it is a rated condition, and it probably is, that is just a small piece of the puzzle. You are going to have to come up with what we call the the 3 Caluza Triangle elements. That is a diagnosis now, an event or record that is in your personal medical records, and then a nexus, or way to connect the two. If you weren't diagnosed with a heart condition in the service, then you will need an IMO from a (heart) doc that gives you the nexus. So if you find it is a rated condition, we encourage you to put in for a disability claim, but you have a lot of work to do to prep that claim. Research is the name of the game. We are here to help if we can. Good luck.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

Look under 6817 Pulmonary Vascular Diseases.....  as far as getting is service connected ... you need to determine what is the actual problem.. as Pulmonary vascular disease covers a lot of different diseases.

Then before you even consider putting in a claim you should get an independent medical opinion  from your doctor(s) especially if this condition was diagnosed 19 years after service. Your doctors will have to 

review all you active duty and private medical records before he/she can determine if your condition is service connected or  has a secondary service connection.  If you were to just put in a claim,  you will likely 

have to do a Claims and Pension exam (C&P)  and you don't want a VA paid doctor that only spends minutes with you to determine your case. 

                                                                                I am not a lawyer so take my opinions with a grain of salt...

If I had listened to the nay sayers, I would never have acheived any ratings after I was awarded TDIU in 1999. Now I have not one but two 100% ratings, a TDIU  and 4 SMC awards !  I say JUST GO For It

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” -Albert Einstein.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
  • HadIt.com Elder

If it was misdiagnosed for 20 years, then it could be a cue claim, especially if your conditions have gotten worse because the misdiagnosis ment that you did not receive proper/appropriate medical care and has caused harm, discomfort, suffering etc. for decades. Again, that is going to assume 1)you can prove you are service-connected, and, 2) you get a terrific IMO from an expert specialist in the appropriate field because of the potential of all that back pay. The VA will really fight against a cue. You also  could not file a cue but reopen due to new evidence. Once you get s-c, then you can re-eval your options. That probably would be the track I would take. You can always go after a cue, no time limit. There is a lot of expertise here on cue claims. But you can't make a decision until you get a clear understanding on what your condition really is. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well it is rated at 100%, but just wanted to know how they connect it to service. It is very hard to diagnose, and I doubt that anyone has really been diagnosed while in the service, seeing that it can be mistaken for asthma, which I was diagnosed with, in the Navy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

GBArmy is right about this being hard to get service connected.  Unless there is an injury or entry in your SMR that highlights an incident that might lead to your condition.  Not to say it cannot be done.  I had a disability service connected after thirty years due to a solid IMO and medical literature that supported it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well, I am waiting on my doctor to be done with testing and she will let me know if was misdiagnosed with asthma all these years, when in actuality I had this disease. But if not, maybe then go for the the sleep apnea and have it connected to the asthma, which is service connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use