Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

supplemental claim exam

Rate this question


SPO

Question

I submitted my supplemental claim a couple weeks ago, and I found out today that the VA requested a new C&P exam.  However, according to the VA it is one I am not required to attend.  This confuses and worries me because I disputed the in person exam I received in the original claim.  Its an arthritis claim so you would think they would want a new set of ROM measurements since the last one was more than a year ago and I brought up multiple issues with it.  Anyone have any idea what is going on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are not required to attend I assume you mean it is an ACE exam. That is where the RO has en examiner make a determination based on medical evidence you already have in the system. So, yes, that certainly would include your ROM Measurements a year ago. The VA doesn't have to have a new C&P exam if they feel that there is enough current info to make the decision already. This is because of the coronavirus and they have stepped up on the ACE exams process. No people, just paper. You might consider doing three things: call the RO and see if you can talk to the manager who schedules C&P's and explain why it isn't right. If you can say that your condition is worse, all the better. The second thing is if they deny your request and the result is an unfavorable exam, you can request a new exam. Use in your aguement that you tried to get a new one before and they wouldn't listen. Last thing would be get an IMO with your own doc after the decision and submit a supplemental with new evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It seems there was a misunderstanding.  The exam was assigned to qtc so I called them. They said what it meant was I do t have to attend right now if I feel unsafe.  They did say they are now attempting to schedule in person and are now working to find a doc for me to go to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Since it does appear I have to attend another exam (which is good because the other one was very bad, and I disputed it in my claim), I want to do anything I can to make sure this one goes right.  Does anyone have any advice how to ensure I'm rated correctly.  This is arthritis that isn't the same everyday, I don't want a good day to completely ruin this whole process.  I know I can explain how bad it can get to the examiner, but I don't trust them to take any of that in to account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@SPO I am going through a similar situation. I had an exam in Aug 2018 which was both inaccurate and inadequate to say the least but my problem was I waited almost a year to challenge the exam even though I had a IMO/IME performed to challenge the information that was on that exam. I did not write my letter until Oct 2019. VA will use that exam till the wheels fall off if nothing is said to discredit it.  If there is a problem with that exam do not wait, the day of the appointment if something is out of order report it to the organization that send you the information about the exam. If that organization is not VA your second call should to your local VA office and to ensure the inquiry gets in your file make a IRIS. Cross all T's and Dot all I's. What you want is the VA to take the wind out of the exam when you challenge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah, this time around I won't be waiting a year until I can get another copy of my c-file to challenge a bad exam. If something smells funny after its done, I'll be calling DAV and VA on my drive home from the exam.  My concern is driving the point home of how severe my condition can be if  I go in on a good day, because I can't predict good days from bad and try to schedule based off that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Are they denying that you have arthritis?  What evidence did you send in with your supplemental claim?

I submitted a supplemental claim for knees, back and left ankle that kept getting denied and BVA remanded it. I sent in a nexus letter from my surgeon just the get the claim out of the same NP that kept denying me. I was sent for new exams and the claims were ultimately approved albeit they made the effect date the date of the supplemental claim. I can’t even tell if they used my nexus letter because it wasn’t listed separately. The supplemental claim was listed and maybe the letter is considered part of the supplemental paperwork. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use