Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

SMC (k)-Hearing Loss

Rate this question


GBArmy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I veteran has a 70% rating for hearing, but was granted TDIU. I've looked at 38 CFR 3.350 for SMC (k) and it really is hard to figure if he is eligible. The rating schedule for hearing, 38 CFR 4.87 doesn't make it clearer. Figuring out the hearing tables is always confusing to me. Because SMC (k) is loss of use, does any one have a clue if he would be eligible for that SMC with a 70% rating? Any comments welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Founder

Perhaps look here §3.350   Special monthly compensation ratings.

(5) Deafness. Deafness of both ears, having absence of air and bone conduction will be held to exist where examination in a Department of Veterans Affairs authorized audiology clinic under current testing criteria shows bilateral hearing loss is equal to or greater than the minimum bilateral hearing loss required for a maximum rating evaluation under the rating schedule.

(Authority: Pub. L. 88-20)

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I did see that but my hang up, I guess, is the "Maximum." Is 100% max, or 70% for his condition. His hearing was so bad the VA did a Cochlear implant. Maybe, if he got the implant after the initial rating, that might mean he should be rated higher on scheduler. (I'm reaching.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder

i am not sure on that one either.

I did get smc k when i was only 50%

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

SMC K (related to hearing loss, there are other "SMC K's) is for "loss of use" of the ears (deafness).  Hill and Ponton says it like this:

 

https://www.hillandponton.com/additional-compensation-smc-k/

Quote

Hearing: SMC for loss of use of ability to hear is best described as SMC for deafness. Deafness exists when there is bilateral hearing loss equal to or greater than what is required for a 100% rating under the VA’s rating Hearing loss must be examined under current VA testing criteria.

In other words, if you have 100 percent VA for hearing loss, you "should" get SMC K, also. 

But, you can also get (another, if applicable) SMC K for Aphonia:

Quote

Speech: Loss of use regarding speech is when the organs of speech are disabled to the point that communication by speech is impossible. For example, when a veteran has a total laryngectomy with tracheostomy they would be entitled to SMC(k).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If he decides to go forward, I'll provide more details if successful for others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
On 10/9/2020 at 1:36 PM, GBArmy said:

I veteran has a 70% rating for hearing, but was granted TDIU. I've looked at 38 CFR 3.350 for SMC (k) and it really is hard to figure if he is eligible. The rating schedule for hearing, 38 CFR 4.87 doesn't make it clearer. Figuring out the hearing tables is always confusing to me. Because SMC (k) is loss of use, does any one have a clue if he would be eligible for that SMC with a 70% rating? Any comments welcome.

I would think he is considered at 100% for the IU but his actual rating is 70%   however if he has a seperate condition at 60% then he would qualified for the SMC S H.B. also if his hearing loss has got worse  then file for increase on the hearing loss and he would most likely get to the 100%scheduler rating as 70% is considered profound hearing loss...so if he is just rated at 100% for hearing loss and no other separate condition  then he won't meet the SMC Criteria

What is confusing here is the ( loss of use rule)  he has loss of use of his hearing but the ears is not considered a organ or organ as part of the body.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use