Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Anybody Used Dr. Dennis Barson, Do, For An Imo Yet?

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm planning on using him but have a few red flags. He graduated as a DO in 2002 but that seems a short time for all his posted qualifications. Can't find him licensed in Virginia??? I don't mind losing the money but I'm worried about my records, especially in this day of ID theft. Any info appreciated!

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

You might want to do a search here at Hadit for this subject. There has been an extensive post and reply section discussing him.

The only negative I see is he wants a fee to even say hello, let alone discussing if you want to hire him.

I emailed him before he added the fee and asked him to contact me to discuss my case to see if he wanted to handle it or if he felt he could. The next thing I know he never contacts me and then he adds a fee to discuss anything.

Very poor business practice and down right bs in my book. Due to his greedyness and failure to contact me, I wont be using him. Supposedly he is here to help the vet, just my opinion that he shouldn't charge for an initial discussion.

Donewsome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Bash talked to us at length over the phone before deciding he could help us, and how much it would cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

His $25 initial fee is certainly reasonable and his IMO's prices are also very reasonable. As one who's used IMO's before in litigation, his fees appear fair and he states that if he can't help he doesn't charge. I'm just concerned as to the authenticity of everything. Anyone can do a website. We'll see what others add. Thanks! jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't need an IMO but if I did I would give strong consideration to him. Try this thread I think it goes over your questions and his qualifications. AMong them being a C&P Doc for QTC and a Naval Surgeon.

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=9918

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His credentials check out. DOs do have a different slant on medicine, but the military uses DOs, so I can't see how the VA could disregard his opinion just because he is a DO. I agree that the $25 fee is reasonable for the price he charges for IMOs. I guess it could be aggravating to someone to pay the $25 fee and have him respond that he can't help you. But I take it that he is charging the fee to keep people from taking his time reviewing all their information to never hear from them again.

He does appear pretty new, but does have experience with the VA - so he knows what it takes...or should know.

So many vets have pretty clear cut cases but just need a doctor that is willing to write an IMO - so the opportunity to get an IMO for those cases at a pretty reasonable rate is a good thing.

Extremely complicated cases might be different. But then again, he might be very good - and again, has reasonable rates.

I have checked his website a couple of times. He is still designing it.

I haven't been able to find the new consultation request form, under the forms tab. - or whatever it is yet (What you send with the inital fee to have him decide if he can help with the case).

Free

His $25 initial fee is certainly reasonable and his IMO's prices are also very reasonable. As one who's used IMO's before in litigation, his fees appear fair and he states that if he can't help he doesn't charge. I'm just concerned as to the authenticity of everything. Anyone can do a website. We'll see what others add. Thanks! jmo

pr

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Phil

I found Dr. Bash to be a little expensive but he called within days of my emailing him and was ready to go. You can negotiate with him over costs. What kind of IMO do you need? I guess it is for a physical condition? Bash does not do psychiatric IMO's. Bash wanted about $2000 for the IMO, but if it means getting some bucks from the VA that is a small price to pay for a high class IMO that gets results. You just want to know you are getting value for your dollar. You don't want to spend and then have your IMO shot down in flames. I think Bash is a real expert at what he does. I wish you could find someone close to where you live so you could interview him, but that is not always easy as I found with lawyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • keepmovingforward earned a badge
      One Year In
    • kidva earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use