Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

News Flash From Nvlsp

Rate this question


Berta

Question

This is only the first 2 pages- there is a 50 page pdf with it-

Attorney_for_vets_proposed_regs.doc

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Founder

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, it says that the VA 'may' authorize any lawyer 'after' they pass the 'new' VA written test for legal representatives.

I can't wait to see that test.

You can bet that only the lawyers that already work for the VA will be able to pass a test that was compiled by VA lawyers.

The VA will probably tack on an unreasonable fee for taking the test and only administer the test in northern Alaska during the month of February, in an unheated pup tent, reachable only by sled dogs.

Of course, this being a government operation, the sled dogs will have to have health certificates issued by the lowest bidder, New Zealand.

And you can't have sled dogs pulling dangerous equipment (for liability reasons).

So the sleds will have to be purchased from a government inspected and certified supplier of wicker baskets for ballons, based in the Virgin Islands.

Since the test can only be administered in February, cold weather gear will have to be used by the properly insured, health inspected, citizenship verified applicants that have prepaid the fee to take the VA test.

Cold weather gear can't be used (for liability reasons) until it has been thoroughly tested at 100 degrees below freezing C.

Of course, testing of arctic cold weather gear can only be tested in an artic setting and at the coldest, VERIFIED, test temperatures.

To verify something that the government will use, you have to have government certified gauges.

To insure the accuracy of the certification of the instruments and gauges an outside contractor will be found through the bidding process.

All bidders will have to meet strict criteria, to be named and specified at a later date, by congress, during appropriation hearings, provided that the funds are available to reimburse the successfull bidder, which will not be available until the Irag war is settled or pregnant nuns are drafted to carry weapons.

Need I go on?

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

An application process and written examination to adhere to.

I believe this will also apply to other forms of representatives. They have to be accredited. If that is fact then the VSO's are in deep trouble. If they have to take the test, I dont see many passing it. The Attorneys will because they have knowledge of the Law and will study to learn it.Keep an eye out for strong opposition to this proposal from the Veterans Service Organizations.

Edited by jbasser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VSO's deserve to be in trouble because they have not been doing their fundamental job of representing vets. It is bad because they are our voice in congress and their failure is our failure. At the bottom of the ladder where the rubber meets the road the VSO's have failed. My representation has been crude and poor from the DAV, VFW and AL over the years. I did not even bother to send them a copy of my agent orange claim last time. I just got the documents together and got the medical opinion and filed the claim. Service connected in about 10 months with no help from the VSO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't see how the VA can require a licensed lawyer to take a written exam. If this is true there are not going to be many lawyers representing Veterans.

If they are going to do this shouldn't they make VA Rating Officers take the same test?

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sledge,

Thank you for the great laugh! I haven't laughed so much since I read Stretch's post a month or so ago where he posted his reply to the VA regarding their allegation that he had a "truck up his nose."

Thanks for keeping a sense of humor - your post was just rich!

I still haven't caught up on reading back posts from the previous week while I've been away but have decided to stop on this thread because, quite frankly, as much as I like to learn by reading the posts, your humor made my night and I'd hate to ruin my good mood by reading more about the inane way the VA implements its own rules and regulations.

Thanks for the great belly laugh,

ts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use