Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question For Berta Or Anyone?

Rate this question


chief 313

Question

dear berta, granted 100% p&t ptsd and mdd june ist 2007. filed orgional claim may 2006.granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.lowed balled,more like 50%.filed for increase 28 of oct o6.quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. thanks for all answers.best regards chief313.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

filed orgional claim may 2006

granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.

filed for increase 28 of oct o6.

quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due

Was the original Sept 06 decision appealed - you said you filed for an increase in Oct 06. This is hard to understand for the normal course would have been to NOD the Sept 06 decision vs filing for an increase.

If you appealed the Sept 06 rating within the required time limits then it appears the effective date should have been May 06 the date of receipt of the claim.

If you did not appeal and somehow began a new claim????? then the effective date would have been Oct 06

Edited by Ricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he need an appeal? Wouldn't a file for increase a month after the Sept 06 decision be an NOD that he disagreed with the rating(which he had one year to file)?

They could go back to the original claim date, in that case.

But their other move would be to set the date of the 100% to the date they decide he actually became 100% disabled..

Free

filed orgional claim may 2006

granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.

filed for increase 28 of oct o6.

quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due

Was the original Sept 06 decision appealed - you said you filed for an increase in Oct 06. This is hard to understand for the normal course would have been to NOD the Sept 06 decision vs filing for an increase.

If you appealed the Sept 06 rating within the required time limits then it appears the effective date should have been May 06 the date of receipt of the claim.

If you did not appeal and somehow began a new claim????? then the effective date would have been Oct 06

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. "

I would think April 2006 should be the effective date of TDIU as long as the doctor supported this above statement and it is all documented-as it was your last date of employment-

Did VA give any rationale at all to support the date they gave you?

Also they often give any SSA date of employability if it is solely for the SC condition and can go back one year prior to the claim date.

Example : my husband filed for higher PTSD rating -Oct or Nov- 1992-

SSA awarded for PTSD back to Oct 1991. The posthumous award said 100% SC as of Oct 1991.

They didnt refer to the SSA award in the narrative but quoted his shrink.

Yet it was obvious that this is how they arrived at this date.

When a doc or SSA says you are unemployable -VA and SSA uses the last date of employment in many cases-as the EED.

This is an advantage if the claim date came after any medical evidence of a prior unemployment date.

But they wont go further back than a year.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This comes under a provision in 38 CFR 3.400 which states that new and material evidence received during an appeal period or prior to an appellate decision will permit assignment of a rating as though the former decision had not been rendered. What was the date of the first V.A. examination which granted the increase which was granted September 2006? I know there may be a way to do this as a CUE claim because my husband's DAV rep did this for him based in part on new and material evidence from Social Security. Look at 38 CFR 3.157 (:angry: and 38 CFR 3.400 (q).

dear berta, granted 100% p&t ptsd and mdd june ist 2007. filed orgional claim may 2006.granted 30%ptsd and mdd sept 06.lowed balled,more like 50%.filed for increase 28 of oct o6.quit working april 06.my pc doctor said unemployable june o6 due to ptsd and mdd. what should correct efective 100% date be?the va says oct 06. or april 06. thanks for all answers.best regards chief313.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

chief,If you would have filed a nod and ask that your claim be reconsider from initial date may of 1966,your effective date would have been May of 1966 but i see you filed for increase sept 6 1966, this might be your effective date.I hope that va taken in consideration that your ptsd symptom was condsider unemployable by your private doctor June 1966 and make that your effective date.Congratulation on your award and i wish you GOOD LUCK on effective date.

mobie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use