Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Eed To 1987-ptsd

Rate this question


Berta

Question

http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files1/0707802.txt

Very interesting case-

In part:

"Upon receipt of additional service department records,

relating to the veteran, in December 1998, the veteran's

original service connection claim for PTSD was automatically

reopened and remains open and pending. The RO's adjudication

and grant of the claim for service connection for PTSD in

December 2003 constituted an adjudication of the pending

claim filed on October 8, 1986."

and

"In this case, the effective date would, under normal

circumstances, be January 23, 1998, as that was the date of

receipt of the veteran's current claim. However, the Board

notes that this case involves the situation where new and

material evidence was received, consisting of "a

supplemental report from the service department, received ...

after the decision has become final." 38 C.F.R. § 3.156©.

In such cases, the prior decisions as to that issue are

automatically "reconsidered" based on all the evidence,

thus negating the finality of the prior decisions regarding

that claim. 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(q) (2006). In this case,

there existed prior final decisions on the claim for service

connection for PTSD. Upon the receipt of the additional

veteran's service records, these decisions were automatically

reopened. Thus, upon receipt of the veteran's service

personnel records in December 1998, his original claim for

service connection for PTSD is to be reconsidered."

Order:

"Entitlement to an effective date of May 18, 1987, for the

grant of service connection for post-traumatic stress

disorder (PTSD) is granted."

Tnere is a lot more to this case but might help someone out there.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am asking VA to make my IU award retro to 1971. I had clear evidence of being IU at the time but the VA is now saying I was not IU because of a SC mental condition but due to a personality disorder. They paid me for a mental condition for 36 years but now it is a personality disorder that made me IU. They are reinterpreting all the evidence to suit themselves to avoid a major payout. They say a passive aggressive personality made me psychotic and IU,ha,ha. You talk about some weird logic and solid BS. When I first filed the CUE they came up with a medical report that was ten years after the error to deny it. I got that thrown out but now they are up to the same tricks. They are making it up as they go along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am going around the " Mulberry Bush", because of " service department records, with all claims opened to 1978.

Why in the heck didn't the VA secure those " Psychiatric Records" themselves in 1978 and when I filed again in 2001.

They waited for me to locate them myself in 2004.

Leaving me with a claim of 43 years to fight to try to prove.

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use