Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Duty To Assist

Rate this question


gp747

Question

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

They are obligated to make an attempt to procure those records. They are not required to obtain the records. If a vet wants to be sure that the RO gets records, then the vet need to collect the records himself and drive them to the RO and get each page date stamped. Even then, the vet can't be sure that the rater will ever get the records, and there's always a chance that even if the records are in the c-file, a rater won't even glance at them.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is a little tid bit from the old M21.

3. Handling Original and New Claims and Claims for Increased Evaluation, Continued

e. Claimant’s Duty to Identify and Locate Records The claimant must cooperate fully with VA’s reasonable efforts to obtain relevant records from

• Federal agencies

• non-Federal agencies, or

• Federal and non-Federal department custodians.

The claimant must provide

• enough information to identify and locate the existing records, including the person, company, agency, or other custodian holding the records

• the approximate time frame covered by the records, and

• the condition for which treatment was provided, in the case of medical treatment records.

f. Claimant’s Duty to Authorize the Release of Existing Records If necessary, the claimant must authorize the release of existing records in a form acceptable to the person, company, agency, or other custodian holding the records.

Note: If the claimant does not provide the necessary release, tell the claimant that he/she must obtain and submit the identified records for them to be considered.

Reference: For more information about authorizing the release of records, see 38 CFR 3.159©(1)(ii).

g. Exception to the Notification Requirement Exception: In cases where the evidence is sufficient to substantiate the claim and grant the benefit sought it is unnecessary to send the “notice statement” of what it takes to substantiate a claim. This exception only applies in cases where there can be a complete grant of the benefit claimed.

If any development is necessary (including ordering an examination), the notice requirement should be fulfilled.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I went to the Hospitals and got oopies of my hospitalizations and forwarded to VA. That way I knew what they had at least.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a little tid bit from the old M21.

3. Handling Original and New Claims and Claims for Increased Evaluation, Continued

e. Claimant's Duty to Identify and Locate Records The claimant must cooperate fully with VA's reasonable efforts to obtain relevant records from

• Federal agencies

• non-Federal agencies, or

• Federal and non-Federal department custodians.

The claimant must provide

• enough information to identify and locate the existing records, including the person, company, agency, or other custodian holding the records

• the approximate time frame covered by the records, and

• the condition for which treatment was provided, in the case of medical treatment records.

f. Claimant's Duty to Authorize the Release of Existing Records If necessary, the claimant must authorize the release of existing records in a form acceptable to the person, company, agency, or other custodian holding the records.

Note: If the claimant does not provide the necessary release, tell the claimant that he/she must obtain and submit the identified records for them to be considered.

Reference: For more information about authorizing the release of records, see 38 CFR 3.159©(1)(ii).

g. Exception to the Notification Requirement Exception: In cases where the evidence is sufficient to substantiate the claim and grant the benefit sought it is unnecessary to send the "notice statement" of what it takes to substantiate a claim. This exception only applies in cases where there can be a complete grant of the benefit claimed.

If any development is necessary (including ordering an examination), the notice requirement should be fulfilled.

well i did all that i gave them permission and list, they had the stuff at ro level and bva level
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got my own SSD records and took them to the VARO, but I understand they will not always take them directly from the vet. It was the same with a certified copy of my DD214 they said they did not have, and I got a copy and carried it to them. I know people who have had such documents rejected by the VA when they were hand delivered by the Vet. I would have waited at least another year for my IU if I had had to wait for the VA to gather all the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use