Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

To Nod Or Not To Nod

Rate this question


gp747

Question

i realise there are vets on here that are in dire circumstances and this is

serious business. i have been going overboard on the posts lately. i sincerely

want to apoligize and want the valuable knowledge of the members of hadit.

i have been rated 30% sc bi-polar panic attacks ptsd. they combined it all

and on award on front says bi-polar. i immediately filed secondary for gerd

throat stricture and copd related to agent orange. i also filed for drastic weight

loss due to gerd. already had claim in trying to reopen arthritis in back varo

was waiting for c-file from amc. also i have filed for increase in my rating. talking

to george patton , who i believe is honarable. i just believe my best bet is not

to nod and try to get increase from appeals but to try to win at varo with what i

have. i am 62 years old now and a long fight with a nod would hold up the new

claims i have and i think would be winnable. i have been doing this by myself and

when i am out of whack i make all kinds of irrational decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Skunk, I'll stick my neck out here and venture to say that most (not all) of the folks here appear to recommend keeping your claim local to your VARO, whenever possible, including requesting a reconsideration or a hearing after a denial.

If you get a VARO denial and decide to appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals, you're probably talking about at least a two-year wait, and most of the time, a "win" at the Board only means that the Board remands it back to the VARO or to the AMC to decide, anyway. In our case, it took a writ of mandamus request to the Court of Veterans Appeals to get action on an appeal that's been pending since 1994, with the Board finally remanding it back to the VARO twice (2001 and 2003), and then back to the AMC twice (2005 and 2008) without any action. We're still waiting for a decision, only now the Court is watching and dishing out deadlines to the VA in increments, under Court scrutiny, until the Court decides the VA's had enough time to make a decision (whenever that may be).

However, we also know that to delay a new claim is to delay the effective date of the claim. You know your situation the best, you also know what your priorities are regarding which claims can yield a positive result in the briefest amount of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skunk, I'll stick my neck out here and venture to say that most (not all) of the folks here appear to recommend keeping your claim local to your VARO, whenever possible, including requesting a reconsideration or a hearing after a denial.

If you get a VARO denial and decide to appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals, you're probably talking about at least a two-year wait, and most of the time, a "win" at the Board only means that the Board remands it back to the VARO or to the AMC to decide, anyway. In our case, it took a writ of mandamus request to the Court of Veterans Appeals to get action on an appeal that's been pending since 1994, with the Board finally remanding it back to the VARO twice (2001 and 2003), and then back to the AMC twice (2005 and 2008) without any action. We're still waiting for a decision, only now the Court is watching and dishing out deadlines to the VA in increments, under Court scrutiny, until the Court decides the VA's had enough time to make a decision (whenever that may be).

However, we also know that to delay a new claim is to delay the effective date of the claim. You know your situation the best, you also know what your priorities are regarding which claims can yield a positive result in the briefest amount of time.

that is what i have been inclining to do , i just believe the nod at amc will go on forever

and i do stand a good chance of winning my secondary claims at varo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think i have finally decided what to do. to heck with the nod not going

to file nod. to heck with the lawyer at this point. i am going to withdraw

my request for an increase because at this time i dont have imo and has

only been about a little over a month since i got my award of 30% i just

dont feel prepared to win that.i am now seeing psychiartist since i got sc

was just seeing pa's ,trainees,what have you, think that was cause of

condition getting worse.

i am going to try to win my secondary claims at varo , meanwhile i will

be building my case for an increase,in case i want to apply later. man

took a long time to think it out . anybody see where i am going wrong

i would appreciate the input,especially about withdrawing for increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skunk, this is not to confuse you, but just to make sure you're aware of the option to file an informal claim. You can file an informal claim for increase, and then have 12 months after the date you file the claim to gather your evidence. You would merely state what you're claiming, and why you're claiming it. You add that this is an informal claim, and that you will provide additional evidence within the next 12 months. That would reserve your effective date of claim as of the date you filed the informal claim, without forcing you to forego the claim altogether until you have ALL your evidence together. Do you see what I mean? It buys you 12 months, if you think you could get what you need together within that time period. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skunk, this is not to confuse you, but just to make sure you're aware of the option to file an informal claim. You can file an informal claim for increase, and then have 12 months after the date you file the claim to gather your evidence. You would merely state what you're claiming, and why you're claiming it. You add that this is an informal claim, and that you will provide additional evidence within the next 12 months. That would reserve your effective date of claim as of the date you filed the informal claim, without forcing you to forego the claim altogether until you have ALL your evidence together. Do you see what I mean? It buys you 12 months, if you think you could get what you need together within that time period. Just a thought.

OHHHHH THANKS VAF!!!! I FORGOT ABOUT THE INFORMAL THING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VAF I TOOK YOUR ADVICE AND MAILED THEM TO CHANGE FROM FORMAL

TO INFORMAL. THAT IS A RELIEF , I WAS WORRIED I HAD FILED TOO SOON

WITHOUT A CHANCE TO CONSIDER AN IMO AND MORE EVIDENCE. I HAVE

BEEN TRYING TO GET A GAME PLAN SINCE I AWS LOWBALLED AT AMC.

THE ONLY HOLD UP NOW MAY BE MY SENATOR HAD MY CLAIMS FOLDER

SENT BACK TO AMC FOR REVIEW. DO YOU THINK I SHOULD TRY TO GET THEM

TO RELEASE IT BACK TO VARO. HOW WOULD I DO IT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use