Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Retinal Detachment And Glaucoma ?

Rate this question


LeroyJohnson

Question

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Right-they pay only one check- that would include any 1151 rating.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK I guess I should explain better the eye situation .I developed a cataract had nothing to do with the service, I went to the VA back in the nineties to have it removed as I had no other insurance. The VA removed the cataract placed the wrong lens in using according to their own records undue force to put the lens in. That force caused the retina to become detached/ they (VA) then preformed several lazar surgeries or if you prefer the word proceeder's to my eye to make it conform to the wrong lens the end result was my eye sight went from 20/30 right after the surgery to light perception only.That was what I filed the 1151 for a botched surgery. Now about 3 years ago the VA told me I had glaucoma in my bad eye and did give me drops. I asked what caused the glaucoma and was told that more than likely it was caused from the multiple lazar surgeries I had to the eye as the type of glaucoma I have can be caused from trauma to the eye. I am in end stage glaucoma now which means that I have now gone from light perception only to completely bind in that eye .They (VA) want to preform another outpatient surgery on my eye to re-route the duct to allow the liquid to flow out which is what is causing the pressure as the eye drop are not working for me. AS far as the tunnel vision in my good eye is concerned they do not know what is causing it nor are they doing anything about it. It took 6 years to win my 1151 case. You must prove that whatever they did you or did not do for you caused you MORE disability. be very careful how you word your case. I was denied several times based on the fact according to them that since I was blind in my eye due to a cataract blocking my vision(it was a very thick cataract)that they caused my NO harm as the end result was I had nothing but light perception because of the cataract and I had nothing but light perception after about 6 months post surgery they felt that they had not caused my additional injury.I had to prove that a cataract was correctable surgery and that what I have now was not correctable and believe it or not it took six years to get that fact thru to them and win my case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you were in Vietnam and have DMII your cataracts should be service connected. It is almost a given. I have cataracts in my right eye and it is getting to the point I may have to have something done. This is just general information to Vietnam vets. The VA will never tell you this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in Vietnam and I do have diabetes type 2 Carlie I don't know if the retinal detachment was complete or not only know what the records say and that is the surgery resulted in a retinal detachment. I also have a cataract in my good eye just not very big yet. As you can see my eyes are a mess at this point in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use