Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Claim

Rate this question


ruby

Question

STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF CLAIM

January 28, 2008

1. By this document I am filing a claim for service connected compensation for prostrating headaches and bilateral radiculopathy secondary to my service connected cervical arthritis.

2. My headaches are frequent in nature occurring on average 3-4 days a week, lasting from a few hours to constant pounding at the base of my skull for days to weeks. These headaches occur primarily at night while I am sleeping. I wake up in mild to severe pain depending on how long my neck was not in proper ligament. I must sit up and put on a neck brace (soft collar), take some form of pain medication either ibuprofen, soma ( muscle relaxant), or percocet. At times when the headache is severe it is necessary for me to take all the above for pain relief. These actions may eliminate the pain or I may have a constant ache at the base of the skull for days. As a result of the headaches my sleep pattern is disturbed. I may get no sleep throughout the night or a limited number of hours. The headaches are becoming more severe in nature due to the ambien (sleeping pill) and prozasin (hyperviligance) that I now take for PTSD symptoms.

In accordance with CFR 38 the percentage for this condition under section 8100 would be 50%.

3. I also have constant tingling and numbness in both hands specifically in the little finger and ring finger along with weakness and pain in my arms and hands. This condition also wakes me frequently at night. In order to eliminate the tingling and numbness I must change positions and shake both hands.

As indicated in the MRI dated June 19, 2008 this condition is moderate to severe in the left and mild to moderate in the right. The EMG performed on November 8, 2008 showed bilateral muscle membrane instability in the C6, C7 myotomes. According to the CFR 38, section xxxx this condition should be rated at 30% for the left and 20% for the right.

4. Enclosed are of pertinent medical records to support this claim.

1. VA Medical Records:

A. rheumatlogist notes--- notes dated August 29, 2008.

B. MRI dated June 19, 2008

C. EMG dated November 8, 2008.

D..I have more notes like from PT saying they wont do PT until I am cleared from a neurosurgeon. I am having pain procedures on my neck for the headaches and numbness and tingling. I also have another note from rheumatologist

Thank you for your time and consideration to my claim.

Respectfully submitted,

Thanks for any response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

no one has an opinion on what the Doc wrote.

Ruby

Ruby,

As you well know, I haven't been posting a lot but I have been observing. I did read your Statement and what your doc wrote. You want the HA and radiculopathy sc'd as secondary to the cervical condition but your doc doesn't mention either or as being "at least as likely as not" (remotely or otherwise) as the case.

He refers to both of them but doesn't make a connection or give an indication to them being secondary (specifically) to the cervical condition. I don't, personally, see where he "...connected the dots..." So, I'm not sure if his progress notes helps or hurts. I'm sure someone else will come along and inject their opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Reminder;...you should conclude all statements in support of your claim with the following sentence: " I hereby certify that the information I have given is true to the best of my knowledge and belief". The VA requires all statements submitted in your behalf, to conclude with that certification sentence. I would also put my VA claim number at the top of all pages.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks luvhim, I don't think it helps but I am not sure it hurts me. He is saying that the radiculopathy and headaches are connected to my sc arthritis as evidenced by the mri/emg. But he didn't word it so an idiot could understand so I am sure the VARO won't get it. I would have to be really lucky to get someone with any brain waves at he VARO level to understand the connection. They are making me an appt with the neurosurgeon guess I will wait it out before filing this claim.

I still haven't heard from the claim I filed a year ago, of course I amended it 8 months later which delayed it further. If I get the neurosurgeon to connect it, then I am filing it and I'll wait another year for them to get it to the raters desk and another year for the rater to rate.

You gotta love them, the system is so good how darn I be upset that my claim is taking over a year for me to get a comp exam or a straight out denial. I am a bad, bad person.

Ruby,

As you well know, I haven't been posting a lot but I have been observing. I did read your Statement and what your doc wrote. You want the HA and radiculopathy sc'd as secondary to the cervical condition but your doc doesn't mention either or as being "at least as likely as not" (remotely or otherwise) as the case.

He refers to both of them but doesn't make a connection or give an indication to them being secondary (specifically) to the cervical condition. I don't, personally, see where he "...connected the dots..." So, I'm not sure if his progress notes helps or hurts. I'm sure someone else will come along and inject their opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use