Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Wording Of Letter From Va

Rate this question


simple fly

Question

hi everyone,surgery went well. got a new letter in mail today for a c and p for ptsd claim i have ongoing. the letter states" in oder to determine the current level of your disability" does that mean they have ruled in favor of ptsd and now need a sc level or is this a generic comment?thanks jim

i had this post in c and p forum but got no response.

need help

<b>for sale.....1 used veteran.slightly broken.

understands very little when it comes to regulations.

please be gentle.housebroken</b> <b>,growls

but does not bite</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Glad everything went well. One good thing is that your stressor has been verified. Now you get to have your C&P exam. Make sure you go to all things mental and look at the exam. The doctor will then opin as to what degree, if any, your PTSD is.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i look at this as a small victory.it only took 35 years for them to verify.

<b>for sale.....1 used veteran.slightly broken.

understands very little when it comes to regulations.

please be gentle.housebroken</b> <b>,growls

but does not bite</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any other perspective on my post? seems this letter may have been seen by others.

<b>for sale.....1 used veteran.slightly broken.

understands very little when it comes to regulations.

please be gentle.housebroken</b> <b>,growls

but does not bite</b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is a generic statement, and the true purpose of a C&P is to ascertain the current level of a disability. I am not seeing where they say they accepted your stressor, unless that's in another thread somewhere. Just because they are sending you to a C&P does not mean that they have accepted a stressor. There could be information in the records that leads them to believe you could be rated for depression or anxiety, rather than PTSD. They are seeing something that is possibly ratable, though. You can always call the C&P department at the VAMC and make nicey nice with them and then ask if they can tell you what the RO is looking for with this C&P. The RO always sends them a communication specifying what information they need out of the exam. You can also ask who your doc will be and what their opinions of him/her is. If you play real nice with these folks, it can come out very beneficial.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I would agree with both Sharon and Purple..it should mean that your stressor has been verified and they are looking to "rate" your PTSD, BUT dont assume anything with the VA.

C and P exams are really Traps set up by the RO to deny you. You need to go to the C and P with things written down as to what you will say to him. No, dont lie about anything..it will make things worse, but dont volunteer information that will be used against you either. For example, if you have had problems with a kid in school, and had a depression episode..dont use those phrases in the same sentence. Or, the C&P doc will say, "Veterans depression is due to family issues and not related to PTSD" If he says that, it will take you a minimum of ten years and ten regular doctors to refute that statement. They will use that statement to deny you for at least 5 more years.

We know that the "family issues" is because of your PTSD..your daughter is afraid you will have a flashback and think she is a Viet Cong.

However, the VA will use this as a trap to deny you.

When you tell the doctor your depression level, and you have felt good on Tues, Wed, and Saturday, but had 2 panic attacks on Monday, and punched through the wall on Friday, Tell him only about Monday and Friday, and dont tell him you felt fine on the other days.

Do you think a potential future employer is gonna want you to work on only your "good" days? No, he is gonna fire you because you punched through the wall on a "bad" day. JMHO

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use