Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Decoding C&p Language

Rate this question


navydoc2

Question

I received copies of my c&p physicals today for both my claims of increased depression and bilateral hearing loss with tinnitis. Here are the findings of the increased depression: I also have a TDIU claim

Axis I Major Depression

Axis II defer

Axis III See Med list

Axis IV Unemployment

Axis V GAF score is 50

The veteran cannot work due to anxiety, agoraphobia and worsened depression

The prognosis is guarded. He is mentally capable of managing benefit payments in his own best interest. Mentally, he occasionally has some interference performing activities of daily living because of his left Knee and depressive problems. He has difficulty establishing and maintaining effective work/school and social relationships because of his isolation. The best description of the claimant's current psychiatric impairmentis: psychiatric symptoms cause occupational and social imparment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks although generally the person is functioning satisfactorily with routine behavior, self care and normal conversation. The above statement is supported by the following symptoms: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, chronic sleep impairment and mild memory loss such as forgetting names directions or recent events . He has no difficulty understanding commands. Based upon the examination, the claimant needs to seek follow up treatment. The claimant requires therapy and medication management. This information was conveyed to the claimant during the examination. The claimant does not appear to pose any threat of danger or injury to self or others.

Audiology: puretone

right

500hz 1000hz 2000hz 3000hz 4000hz b+C+

30 40 35 50 40 41.25

left

500hz 1000hz 2000hz 3000hz 4000hz b+C+

35 40 40 65 60 56.25

Diagnosis:

For the claimant's claimed condition of BILATERAL HEARING LOSS, the diagnosis is bilateral hearing loss. The subjective factors are the claimant report of hearing loss. The objective fators are audiometric findings.

For the claimant's claimed condition of TINNITUS, the diagnosis is bilateral persistent tinnitis. The subjective factors are claimant report of tinnitus. The objective factors are the claimant's subjective report.

For the right ear, the claimant has moderate, mixed (sensorinural and conductive) hearing loss. For the left ear, the claimant has a moderately severe mixed (sensorineural and conductive) hearing loss. If treated the problem will cause a change in the hearing threshold level because resolving any middle ear pathology can improve air conduction thresholds.

Answers to the questions from VA

In reference to the question "IT IS LESS LIKELY AS THAN NOT THAT THE VETERAN'S HEARING LOSS IS RELATED TO ACOUSTIC TRAUMA FROM COMBAT NOISE", due to the presence of an air-bone gap bilaterally with flat tympanograms normal ear canal volumes and absent ipsilateral acoustic reflexes.

It is as least as likely as not that the veteran's tinnitis is related to acoustic trauma from combat noise due to the reported time of onset and the noises inherentin those duties that are known to cause tinnitis.

If anyone can shed some light on these findings and what to expect from my RSO please help me. thanks in advance.

navydoc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

name='john999' date='Jul 4 2009, 08:46 PM' post='152931']

Navydoc

Being an in-patient might really help your cause. Also, steady record of psychiatric treatment is very important for IU claims. You want documentation of your inability to work and your low level of functioning. You are getting good advice here. The VA knows that once you get IU you will never work again, so they make it hard to get it. I had been seeing a VA shrink for years and had a recent in-patient stay, and I still had to fight like cats and dogs to get IU even after I got SSDI, so it is not easy. You have to turn over every rock and jump through every hoop to get it. People here have been on SSDI for years and the VA still denied them IU or 100%, and they had to fight on to get it. Don't be discouraged because they make it hard and act stupid when you know you can't work due to your SC.

Believe me I do appreciate the advice I've received here, I've learned more about my claims and how to go about the whole process here than any advice a VSO has ever given me. I'm taking notes and sucking it in like a sponge. thanks to you guys I'm an informed veteran. If the need arises I will not hesitate to go inpatient and I do plan on continuing my treatment.

Edited by navydoc2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

navydoc2

John pretty much answered your question. The VA does not focus on any one statement made by a doctor or GAF score. The law allows them to base a rating on a more general perception of your ability to function. That is where being an in-patient and treatment works in your favor.

My perspective was from the point of getting 100%. I took this from the statement that you could not work. I did not think that the C&P doc would have made that statement unless you told him that you could not work. C&P docs do not make such an assessments unless the veteran has stateted an inability to work.

The question in your claim that I see from the way the C^P was written is that I did not get the impression the C&P doc thought that your current state of functioning would not improve. I have seen docs specifically say that improvement was not expected. Instead the doc in your case talked alot about treatment. I am not sure that they would make a big jump in the rating based on that C&P.

The one year and a half without work time frame is approaching the point where I have seeh raters start conmsidering that there is a significant problem. Hospitalization is not necessary. However, an extended period of unemployment combined with treatment would show that your condition is definately in need of a higher rating.

The fact that the timeframe you have not worked was not discussed in the C&P shows the superficiality of the exam. I would expect that the time frame without employment should have been brought up by you and re ststed by the C&P examiner. This is an important factor. If you get back into treatment definately let them know the lenght of time you have been out of work. I often tell veterans to get the free SSD income statement and take it with them to the treatment appointment and to submit a copy to the RO with a statement insupport of the claim.

If you really are at a point in your life where you think that continued employment is not an option then you need to load for bear and take the best evidence with you to the treatment appointment or any future C&P and for sure get it to the RO.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use