Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange

Rate this question


sgmdae

Question

I am working with a RVN Vet, that has tremendous skin discoloration and had a baby that was deformed in its lower extremeties, and was dead when borned

He always felt it was because of Agent Orange.

He went to the Veterans Clinic in 1974, but kind of got lip service, I think many can relate to the early days of the Agent Orange Crisis

Can anyone give me guidance on cases in the past and where to start with this VET

I have the PTSD covered, but need to learn for him and others about Agent Orange

Edited by sgmdae

100% PTSD

20% right ankle

20% left ankle

10% Right Knee

20% Right Shoulder

10% Tinnitus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I know how this VET feels. I had a son who died 20 to 30 minutes after birth back in 1976 due to multiple deformaties, (webbed fingers and toes, large hole in chest area, among others.) I also have a daughter who has two heart deffects. The one thing I wished I would have had done was an autopsy on my son but didn't. I brought this to the attention of the VA and received absolutely no help or responce at all. When asking my VA PCP about this I always got pushed to another subject.

To this day, and probably until the day I die, I will always feel these defects in my children were caused by AO!

Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how this VET feels. I had a son who died 20 to 30 minutes after birth back in 1976 due to multiple deformaties, (webbed fingers and toes, large hole in chest area, among others.) I also have a daughter who has two heart deffects. The one thing I wished I would have had done was an autopsy on my son but didn't. I brought this to the attention of the VA and received absolutely no help or responce at all. When asking my VA PCP about this I always got pushed to another subject.

To this day, and probably until the day I die, I will always feel these defects in my children were caused by AO!

Jeff

Sorry for your loss. I too had a similar incident and will always wonder if AO was responsible. I had a beautiful baby girl born who looked "perfect" on the outside." She died within 1 day due to a rare deformity called "Diaphragmatic Hernia." This is when there is a pinhole in the diaphragm and her intestines came through the pinhole pushing her lung over into her heart. Consequently her lungs were not developed well enough. It was 99% fatal back then. Nowadays - they can operate while the baby is still in the womb. Nobody saw it on any "scan" although they should have. Like you - I'll always wonder if AO was the cause. I've not had anything in family history such as this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA gives comp to the women that served in the RVN for child birth defects but not to the men. I'm wondering where the heck do they think that poisoned seed came from.

Can a male vietnam veteran file a claim for these birth defects that killed or crippled our children and hope that the government someday will finally realize that AO exposure was the cause of their medical problems and fes up.

Jeff

Arty - sorry to hear of your loss also.

Edited by Sgt Schmidt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know it might be wise to file a claim for the birth defect even though it is not considered presumptive now. If it becomes presumptive you can recapture an earlier effective date. You have very little to lose in doing this. Somebody who filed for DMII due to AO exposure before the disease was added to the list can get a much earlier date on the disability. Berta knows just how this applies.

It could be wise for RVN vets to file for any disease that might become presumptive one day. You hedge your bets. The VBM has lists of diseases that they believe will become presumptive for AO in the future. We are not getting any younger, but I bet they will still be adding AO presumptives when I am 80 years old, knock on wood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Sgt Schidmt is right about birth defects being covered by women who served in RVN.

However, the child of any veteran male or female that has AO presumtion, that has spina bifida (not occulta), or any of the AO presumptive conditions is covered.

In women RVN vets any birth defects is covered, but only if the child survives. If the child dies cover is only provided for the time they were alive, so if the child lived for less than a month there is not comp.

At least that is my undertanding, please correct me if I am wrong! :D

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use