Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Does The Va Keep An Electronic Record Of Decision?

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

I received a copy of my C file from the RO recently. I thought it was odd the box was only 3 inches thick, when my box, which is incomplete, contains a stack of at least 12 inches of records. The RO has shredded (or they are missing) more than 1000 pages, about 70% of my files. Since there are multiple RO decisions missing from my files, multiple VCAA letters, multiple NOD's etc, does the RO keep an electronic record of the RO decisions, or do they even know about them? I know they keep an e-record of the percentages, but do they keep an e record of the "reasons and basis" for denials?

For about 3 years, I noticed that whenever I filed a NOD, they dont respond to it, ever, instead, they just issued a new decision pretty much just giving "lip service" to my NOD.

Yes, I have filed a Special Handling Request due to shredded documents. I saw an "internal" memo that they put in my c-file, saying they did not think my case was a valid "shred" case, because some of the documents I listed in the SHR were in my file, while others were missing but outside of the dates in the fast letter. That is, they pretty much admitted shredding, but said it was ok, because it was way before the "october incident" and year 2002 shredded documents did not qualify for special handling under the fast letter.

Earlier, I probably would have been mad about this, but it just does not suprise me anymore.

If the VA looses their own decisions, how can they possibly respond to my NOD's, when they dont even know why they denied me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Once a file get's too thick (binded out) the old stuff gets refiled and stored. This is so the old stuff doesn't mix in with the newer claims. I was told this by a rater.

Jerr

The file is supposed to stay together -

no matter how many volumes there are.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Delta....

I seem to recall reading what you are referring to, but I cant remember when/where. Altho I think Carlie is right, they are 'supposed' to keep the file together, I also know that no 2 RO's do everything the same...everything is 'willynilly'. People are always saying 'the VA does this' or 'the VA does that, instead', but the statistics reveal that there is a wide variety of differences between Regional Offices, including, but not limited to the average compensation paid per Veteran. That means to me that the RO managers can pretty much do whatever they want to do, and we Veterans have no choice but to abide by whatever they say, whether it is fair or not. Sure, we can appeal, but that takes 4 years according to Veterans for Common Sense.

I am convinced, however, that the BVA/CAVC/Federal Courts are much more consistent about applying the applicable regulations and, frankly, Veterans get a fairer shake by appealing than the do at their RO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you request your C-File they are supposed to send it all. I have been to the VA and seen my file. It is large. If there is something in your file that you want you can get them to copy it on the spot of you. This way you know exactly what you are getting. I mean if you had a question on a rating you can get everything the VA has on the decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
When you request your C-File they are supposed to send it all. I have been to the VA and seen my file. It is large. If there is something in your file that you want you can get them to copy it on the spot of you. This way you know exactly what you are getting. I mean if you had a question on a rating you can get everything the VA has on the decision.

John you sound as bad as me the last time I saw my file it was at the BVA hearing it was on 2 gurneys and has 5 of those long boxes....I have no idea on how many reams of paper are in there but a few small trees for sure.....

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's supposed to but since there's not a regulation for this some RO's deviate from the normal protocol.

Man, I sure wish there was a regulation for this though.

Jerr

The file is supposed to stay together -

no matter how many volumes there are.

jmho,

carlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get your C-File and find an old decision in which there is no record that you ever received your appeal rights I wonder what kind of error that might be. In most legal proceedings that is a fatal error not to inform a claimant that they have appeal rights. Really old decisions from the VA that are in your c-file are so incomplete that I think they all deserve a second look. Your C-File is not stored electronically. It is paper. Paper gets lost over 40 years. If the record is lost how can they reconstruct it? As far as I know if all particulars of a decision are not in your C-File they do not exist, especially for old decisions.

I agree with John, if you do not have a decision letter in the c file then it is an open claim no matter how old the claim is.

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use