Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod,cue And Appeal

Rate this question


trailblazer

Question

I was recently denied on my tdiu claim and part of it was my fault. I didn' get the form from my former supervisor before they made the decision. The va said they contacted my former supervisor but he says he never received it and I believe him. They also said there was no record in my file that indicated I had a prescription for insulin. This info is in my private Dr's examination reports of which the va has a copy of which they didn't review. They also gave me a specialized eye examination which stated that I could count fingers at four feet with my left eye . I can't count fingers at two feet. The decision also said that my eyes had improved since my last evaluation and the current evaluation was not permanent. I see my private eye Dr. every six months and there is a lot of difference in the two examinations. Right now I am looking at an appeal, a nod and a cue. Is this the way I should persue this? BTW I take 116 units of insulin a day and they don't have a record. I think I am dealing with retarded people at the va.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

More knowledgeable people will come along, but until then...

What you want to file is a NOD. That means you get put into the appeal process where you have I believe a year to submit evidence for your notice of disagreement.

Once you file the NOD, then the VA usually offers you the choice of a DRO or traditional appeal. Go the DRO since that occurs in your Regional Office which should be faster. If you disagree with the decision by the DRO, you can still choose to send your appeal down the traditional appeal road.

A CUE only happens after all avenues are explored, if I remember correctly what has been written here in hadit. Since we didn't have to do a CUE I am very fuzzy on that step...just know it is not of immediate concern.

NOW, If you have found a bunch of incorrect or unfound information in already submitted documents, you can submit that to the DRO.

When my hubby's original claim was NOT rated correctly, we got a VSO but I did all the work and submitted each decision with all the pertinent proofs that refuted their findings and supported my hubby's disabilities. When we turned the last of these written multi-page reports to the VSO on a Friday, by Monday they were with his negotiator at the VA. By Thursday the claim had been resolved by the DRO. That decision letter when we received it acknowledged all that we had submitted as well as their errors on the original claim decision.

If you go to my website, there is a section about Appealing that offers info on how to write up that kind of report. I created this website following the steps I did to help my hubby. I thought it might help others.

hope this helps.

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I would NOD, and send them the proof that they already hold, along with the date you sent it the first time. You should also site the regulations that support TDIU and how your medical conditions support TDIU.

I sent in 250 pages the last time they denied me...I figured if they couldn't find it the first time, it would be there handy for them the second time.

CUE's to the best of my knowledge are for claims that are already closed (tell me if I am wrong please) and involve legal errors or misapplication of their codes.

Flying from the seat of my pants here - I am an understudy myself.

The Sages will chime in and direct you down the right path.

Never give up!

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

A NOD is filed whenever the decision was within the one year appeal period. In the NOD, you have 3 options:

1. DRO Review. An experienced person looks over your claim and makes a new decision. The fastest option (However, if it is denied by the DRO review, you will still have to file a BVA appeal, and you loose all the time waiting for a DRO Review)

2. DRO Hearing. A hearing will be scheduled with a DRO hearing officer where you would be present, for example, to make sure all the evidence is available for the decision maker to award your claim. DRO hearings take a long time because DRO hearing officers are mostly booked up for a year or more.

3. BVA appeal. The most thorough appeal, but also probably the most lengthy. Veterans for common sense says this takes 4 years.

A CUE normally applies only when you did NOT appeal within the one year period after your RO decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you scan and attach this decision here? (Cover the personal stuff)

More and more I seem to see a basis for asking VA to CUE their own decisions as soon as they arrive in the mail.

Or to ask for a reconsideration. None of these tactics stop the NOD year filing date0 the NOD MUST still be filed within one year after the denial- but often these tactics can bring a better response before that year is up.

I got my FTCA check in the mail yesterday-this resulted from asking them to CUE themselves about 9 months ago -I made no NOD and no reconsideration request on this but I had the regs at hand and sent them and rattled them off to VA every chance I got-specifically noting the exact regs in the request I made that they CUE themselves.

This can work if they make legal errors or -if you have prime evidence of TDIU that they failed to consisder ,it could be submitted with a reconsideration request instead.

I bet they deliberately never even sent the employer the forms and this gave them a way out to deny.

But still if we can see the actual denial- we would have better way to assess the approach you need to take.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask for a reconsideration. I am always telling everyone to do them but most people do not for some reason. The VARO processes them quickly and they have always been successful for me. I haven't done anything but recons. My three increases came from three recons. The last one took exactly 4 months to go from 30 to 50%. Recons = Cash, well, that's my opinion and experience.

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use