Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vamc Physcians Opinion

Rate this question


Mcafee

Question

Hello All Hope All Is Well.

My question is simple if you recieve care and treatment from a VAMC for service connected injuries sustained during service.And ask your neuro or PCP for an opinion.

I would like to think that this show a clear validation of care and treatment for these injuries over many years.

I would like to think that the VARO utilizes VAMC documentation before an outside opinion or just take the two opinions and meet some where in the middle provided they actually read the documentation for rating purposes.

Your Thoughts and Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I also get curious about the process when it comes to the claims decider and/or author. I am not convinced that valid medical opinions are equitably weighed when it comes to disability claims. I have seen comments very and exactly selectively placed in the decision statements in VA ratings. I only know that because I get copies of my C&P exams and see whats written. I get copies of my VAMC clinical records. I have a complete copy of my Service Treatment Records (STR) and VA claims file (C-File). I also have most of my Service Personnel Record. Thanks to the VA, I have a copy of my private doctor records, because they requested them for the claims I filed. To keep current, I have to be a perpetual gatekeeper of my Veteran 'stuff'.

To this day, I find the opinions contradicted, contorted and extracted - but mostly 'Paraphrased' and wordsmithed. Some are actually written to my benefit - great!! Some are written very negatively for two whole pages, only to conclude one factual statement and confirmation of the rating requested? oh yeah, some don't even reference the 'why' for the decision. Some decisions merely 'recant' the regulations, paragraphs and verbage as if I know it all. Two different decisions show the guidance only, one approved one denied - with no further discussion, thats all folks. Er, accept the opinion or appeal.

Ok - my vent, I don't know how the rating scales work 'exactly' but have seen some of the guidance raters or claims processors are supposed to use. Its no wonder.

Next topic? :o - those vague VCAA letters or my thought 'why waste trees?'.

Cg'up,2,3,4...........

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hello All Hope All Is Well.

My question is simple if you recieve care and treatment from a VAMC for service connected injuries sustained during service.And ask your neuro or PCP for an opinion.

I would like to think that this show a clear validation of care and treatment for these injuries over many years.

I would like to think that the VARO utilizes VAMC documentation before an outside opinion or just take the two opinions and meet some where in the middle provided they actually read the documentation for rating purposes.

Your Thoughts and Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You all for your input and replys.

I do think the Janitor would probably would give a more favorable exam than a PA would.

I have an upcoming exam this month the promblem I face however this same PA did the last one and turned out to be a REMAND and four years in the making?

I asked to make arragements for a different PA for the exam whom I have also had an exam 6 years ago? I still like the JANITOR idea though. lol Thank You again.

One last thing along with the letter from VARO requesting any info toward my Appeal they did not send VCAA letter but they did send another VETERANS name and claim number and what the exam was for IMAGINE!!!!!!!!!!!Along with my upcoming C+P exam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know in Tampa where I live there are two VAMC's within 25 miles of each other. There are doctors in practice who were working for the VA. If you can find these doctors to do IME's you are in like Flynn. It seems to me that one day the lawyers will line up doctors who know how to write IMO's and IME's and claims will start getting approved in a hurry, maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA Regional Office and the VA Medical Center are two seperate organizations. The best example I can give is the Gas company and the Electric company. While they are both utilities they have nothing to do with each other. The opinion of a VA doctor has no more weight or less weight than a civilian doctor.

Either way the evidience must be credible and not based on personal history ( just what you told the doctor). They must show medical rationale. It is also important that the doctor state that he/she have reviewed your service medical records and provide a connection (nexus) to the current condition.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know in Tampa where I live there are two VAMC's within 25 miles of each other. There are doctors in practice who were working for the VA. If you can find these doctors to do IME's you are in like Flynn. It seems to me that one day the lawyers will line up doctors who know how to write IMO's and IME's and claims will start getting approved in a hurry, maybe.

John,

Yes, we have both James Haley and Bay Pines VAMC's

right close together. I think if USF did not exist

VA would have probably never built James Haley VAMC.

You're right about the lawyers finding specific doctor's also,

just like the lawyers for SSA do.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use