Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nehmer.......?

Rate this question


hawkfire27

Question

I was just trying to understand what Nehmer does.

I understand it effects retro in Agent Orange claims but how?

Does it take retro back to the 1st claim date that was previously denied?

or does it take it back to date of diagnosis?

In the case of an IHD claim, if the first claim date was in 1996, but the vet was first diagnosed in 1988 for IHD and recieved SSD for it at that time and the vet's PTSD rating also goes back to 1988 to the day the first major heart attack happened, how would Nehmer apply?

and how would a vet go about requesting Nehmer to be taken into consideration on their claim, how would you write it up?

Soory about all the questions, just trying to understand this very important Case, and thought other vets with IHD claims may be interested to find out too. :D

Edited by hawkfire27

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There should be considerable info here as to Nehmer under the AO forum as well as the search feature.We will be doing more shows on AO and Nehmer at SVR radio as well and that info will be posted here for anyone to listen ion or call in with Nehmer questions.

This is the basic retro benefit description under the Nehmer Court Order.

At their web site NVLSP has other extensive Nehmer info.They are the lawyers who represented Beverly Nehmer, widow, and won a class action case that has affected tens of thousands of vets and their dependents,

“The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is adding a new provision to its adjudication regulations concerning certain awards of disability compensation and dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC). The new rule explains that certain awards of disability compensation or DIC made pursuant to liberalizing regulations concerning diseases presumptively associated with herbicide exposure may be made effective retroactive to the date of the claim or the date of a previously denied claim, even if such date is earlier than the effective date of the regulation establishing the presumption.

The new rule also provides that VA may pay to certain survivors of a deceased beneficiary, or to the beneficiary's estate, any amounts the beneficiary was entitled to receive under the effective date to reflect the requirements arising from court orders in the class action litigation in Nehmer v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, No. CV-86-6160 TEH (n.D. Cal.). Effective Date: September 24, 2004”

from

http://www.nvlsp.org/Information/ArticleLi...tivebenefit.htm

I am a Nehmer class action widow.

My husband's death was declared due to AO last year. My EED for DIC is Oct 1994 (DOD)

After a skirmish-they paid up this March.(Skirmish wasn't due to AO death issue but due to something else)

How this works for veterans is under the AO form.

In most cases the EED is the date of any past denial for what is now an AO presumptive disabilty.

This vet lost an EED he wanted but the BVA decision is correct and shws how Nehmer works.

He re-opened in 2003 after a 1999 denial for CLL.

His EED is 1999 date of initial denied claim.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The veteran originally claimed entitlement to service

connection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia due to herbicide

exposure on October 20, 1999; the claim was denied in

February 2000.

2. The veteran filed a claim to reopen on January 27, 2003.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for an effective date earlier than October 20,

1999, for the award of service connection for chronic

lymphocytic leukemia have not been met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5107,

5110 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.114, 3.400, 3.816 (2008).

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files1/0901428.txt

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

This question doesn't come under Nehmer (I don't think).....Is there any benefit out there that can give retro benefits to surviving spounse for Original diagnosis of Cancer of Larynx? What I mean is that my husband was first diagnosed with Cancer of Larynx with cancer surger In September 2001. We did not file a claim until January 2008. We did not know of AO, claims, etc..,until January 2008.

I was just wondering. Don't think so but never hurts to ask. My husband only collected benefits for five months then passed away last year.

Thank you for your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA saved thousands of bucks by not informing your husband that he had an AO claim. I think that is criminal. Did you ever talk to a VSO? I would look at my C-file to see what is in it. There might be some sort of informal claim in there. Anything that might be interpreted as a claim could mean Nehmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes- I agree John -it is criminal behavior when VA does that-

The issue must be that the claim must have been for what can be reasonably contrused as the same disability that is now presumptive to AO.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply but nope, we never put in a claim before January 2008. I had just been wondering if there was something out there for Original Diagnosis of Sept. 2001.

Happy Memorial Day to all our Veterans!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use