Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Letter - Need Help!

Rate this question


Draggin'

Question

OK here is my sample Notice of Disagreement letter.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT

I am sending to inform you that I disagree with the decision made October 1, 2009 for the below mentioned issues. I wish to appeal this decision and request a DRO denovo review for all below mentioned issues.

Part 2

Issue #1 - Denied Knee Pain, left knee

Issue #2- Awarded Ankle Pain, right ankle

(etc...here I am just listing the decisions I disagree with that they either denied me on or awarded and the award is too low)

Part 3

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

I would also like to ask for reconsideration on the following issues

Issue #1 - Denied Knee Pain, left knee

(etc...here will be a repeat of the issues of Part 1)

Part 4

Also attached is an application for TDIU.

Sincerely

Signature

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

My questions...

#1 What do you think?

#2 I do not have specific information to send in with this yet. I do not have my medical records yet. Although it can be seen in my recent VA medical records that I have been , and am currently being seen for these issues. In all "issues" I am only stating the claim that was made and whether it was denied or awarded - no other details, no reason why I disagree, etc. Is this sufficient-just for now?

#3 Is it OK to send in an application for TDIU with this?

My deadline is the 30th, and I will be personally taking this to my RO to insure it gets there! We have tried to compile more information but it has taken everything to get the PTSD and marriage proof in...along with numerous trips to outpatient and VA Dallas to get my medical issues worked on. Is this good enough to get it started?!! How will I send in additional information later?

Thanks so much

Draggin'

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

It might be worth driving to the VARO and getting your NOD copied and date-stamped when you deliver it. This way you would have proof that they actually did receive it before your NOD deadline.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the plan!

Funny, last time we were there the lady said that she didn't have the time stamp and it was locked up and she didn't have access to it.

What's up with that?!!

So we want it copied after they date stamp their copy, correct??? Or will they just date stamp both our copy and theirs?

Draggin'

Edited by Draggin'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get R done. Dont miss the deadline or you will be royally screwed.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, wife and I got the NOD letter done. OK, she did. She did such an awesome job on my PTSD stressor letter and proof (managed to get that one reopened and get me 50% first try!)

I'm including the NOD here. Yes there is a LOT there :ohmy: , and there was more in my original claim...(this was something advised by our VSO). And YES, I am young and yes these are legitimate issues, 90% of which were diagnosed and confirmed with C&P and simply denied service connection on a direct basis. And yes I feel like "poo" on a consistent basis. :wacko: I would have more information in there right now if it wasn't for the time crunch and due to the differences I've had with my first Primary Care doc. We're on our way to Regional Office tomorrow.

You can comment on the letter, not sure if it will do me any good before we leave. But I hope it may do some good for someone else for future reference.

Draggin'

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

September 25, 2010

Department of Veteran Affairs

VA Regional Office

Attention: SS# - In Reply to: document #

To Whom it May Concern,

I received a rating decision dated October 1, 2009. Consider this letter to be an official “Notice of Disagreement” (NOD) regarding the following disability/disabilities:

GERD 10% Awarded (#2)- The severity of this disability warrants a higher rating. Also, this disability causes secondary issues including the "Diarrhea and Excessive gas (#10)", "Chest pain and tightness (#22) " and "Ulcer (#36)" claims that were made on April 30, 2009.

Right Ankle Sprain 10% Awarded (#3)- The severity of this disability warrants a higher rating. This disability also contributes to a bilateral condition and therefore warrants a bilateral award.

Lumbosacral strain 10% Awarded (#6)- The severity of this disability warrants a higher rating.

Patellofemoral Syndrome (Left Knee) 10% Awarded (#4)- The severity of this awarded disability warrants a higher rating and is causing secondary issues that need to be considered. This disability also contributes to a bilateral condition and therefore warrants a bilateral award.

Right Shoulder Strain 10% Awarded (#5)- The severity of this awarded disability warrants a higher rating and is causing secondary issues that need to be considered, including aggravating non service connected left shoulder strain and neck pain.

Migraine Headaches 0% Awarded (#8)- The severity of this disability warrants a higher rating. Coincides with right shoulder strain and neck issues.

Left Ankle Sprain (#9)- I disagree with the denial of service connection, also the severity of the condition has since increased. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Right Hip Pain (#15)- I disagree with the denial of service connection and the evaluation of the severity of the condition. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition in the legs and back. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Left Hip Pain (#16)- I disagree with the denial of service connection and the evaluation of the severity of the condition. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition in legs and back. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Hypothyroid (#17)- I disagree with the denial of service connection and the evaluation of the severity of the condition. Prescriptions have been doubled. Contributes to weight gain/obesity and GERD.

Patellofemoral Syndrome (right knee) (#18)- I disagree with the denial of service connection and the evaluation of the severity of the condition. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition (right ankle). I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Muscle Pain (left leg) (#19) - I disagree with the denial of service connection. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition in the legs/feet. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Muscle Pain (right leg) (#20)- I disagree with the denial of service connection and the evaluation of the severity of the condition. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition in the legs/feet. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Overweight / Obesity (#24)- This condition is a symptom of depression and PTSD and is aggravated by the medications for a service connected condition (PTSD).

Skin Irritation Between Toes (#28) - I disagree with the denial of service connection. I have had consistent problems with severe athlete's foot and my feet stayed constantly wet in my boots while in service. This is a condition I had to learn to self medicate and deal with, therefore, it slipped my mind to have it looked at by my doctor. It was not apparent during C&P exam, but it is a recurrent and painful problem.

Restless Leg Syndrome (#30)- I disagree with the denial of service connection. I am prescribed medication for this. Associated with service connected PTSD.

Pain and degenerative changes top of foot (both feet) (#31) - I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Left Shoulder Pain (#34)- I disagree with the denial of service connection. It also states in award letter #34 that "Service for left shoulder pain is granted.", but no award was granted. Also, this is aggravated by a service connected condition. I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Snoring (#35)- This is caused by a service connected condition. (PTSD, depression, and associated sleep disorder and weight gain).

Right Wrist Tendonitis (#38)- I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Left Wrist Tendonitis (#39) - I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Plantar Fascitis, Bilateral (#41) - I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field.

Chronic Fatigue (#43) - This symptom/condition was caused or intensified by medication currently prescribed for a service connected disability. (PTSD). Also this is a secondary symptom of service connected PTSD and Sleep Disorder.

Neck Condition (#44) - I disagree with the denial of service connection due the amount of physical exertion needed to perform my job duties in the field. Related to service connected migraines and shoulder.

Nightmares (#40) - Related to PTSD/Sleep Disorder which was later awarded. It was stated in 1st award letter (October 9, 2009) that compulsive behaviors are related to PTSD and should be considered in the overall evaluation of PTSD. I feel this was not evaluated and diagnosed as it should have been. Nightmares have increased in severity in spite of medication.

Anxiety (#25) - Related to PTSD/Sleep Disorder which was later awarded. It was stated in 1st award letter (October 9, 2009) that compulsive behaviors are related to PTSD and should be considered in the overall evaluation of PTSD. I feel this was not evaluated and diagnosed as it should have been. Anxiety has increased in severity in spite of medication.

Depression (#45) - Related to PTSD/Sleep Disorder which was later awarded. It was stated in 1st award letter (October 9, 2009) that this condition was related to PTSD and should be considered in the overall evaluation of PTSD. I feel this was not evaluated and diagnosed as it should have been. Anxiety has increased in severity in spite of medication.

Memory Loss with confusion (#12) - I disagree with the assessment of the severity of this condition. Also, this condition is aggravated by the medications prescribed for PTSD.

Fibromyalgia (#37) - I disagree with the denial of service connection. Although there are verified sources of joint pain as explained in denial reason, there are still widespread and unexplained pains with no diagnosis, such as back, neck, hips, shoulder, all fingers, feet, and muscles etc.

I am requesting a “De Novo Review” by a new Decision Review Officer.

Sincerely

Signature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use