Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Prior Medical Conditions

Rate this question


Papa

Question

When one goes to their Entrance Exams, and you tell the Doctors that you have a medical issue, but they ignore it. They do not advise you to get any medical records from your private Doctor, they just laugh and send you through and pass you. Now, you are out of the military, and you file a claim for disability based upon your prior condition. Now, the VA denies you because they say that you had this prior to your military time. I always wondered how this could be since at the Entrance Exam they basically tell you that you are full of cr*p. Once, they pass you, are they not telling you that you were in 100 percent physical condition at the time you entered the military? So, how can the VA tell Veterans that were honest at the Entrance Exam that they are denied?

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

When one goes to their Entrance Exams, and you tell the Doctors that you have a medical issue, but they ignore it. They do not advise you to get any medical records from your private Doctor, they just laugh and send you through and pass you. Now, you are out of the military, and you file a claim for disability based upon your prior condition. Now, the VA denies you because they say that you had this prior to your military time. I always wondered how this could be since at the Entrance Exam they basically tell you that you are full of cr*p. Once, they pass you, are they not telling you that you were in 100 percent physical condition at the time you entered the military? So, how can the VA tell Veterans that were honest at the Entrance Exam that they are denied?

Papa

exactly,, also, unless they do a DNA test how would they know what is genetic? they are frakkin liars!

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They tried to give me some kind of pre-existing condition.

My lawyer had to explain to the RO that being accepted into the service with no defects on the entrance exam, is the ruling document.

They can't come back to your case after you get out and add stuff to the entrance exam.

It's called tampering with the evidence.

If your disability is not a recognized genetic defect you will prevail.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In this case you told them you had the condition . They may have let you in and laughed at it but I am sure they wrote it down.

The only way to recoup any benefit for this scenario is to use the aggravation factor.

The Presumption of soundness rule is pretty clear,

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

They tried to give me some kind of pre-existing condition.

My lawyer had to explain to the RO that being accepted into the service with no defects on the entrance exam, is the ruling document.

They can't come back to your case after you get out and add stuff to the entrance exam.

It's called tampering with the evidence.

If your disability is not a recognized genetic defect you will prevail.

sledge

Hey Sledge,

One of my SC ratings was awarded as 30%, but reduced by 10% because a C&P doctor said I had the condition prior to service. I need to dig out my entrance exam to confirm if it was listed. If the item is not present on the entrance exam, do you think what you explained applies to this situation?

Also, we have to fight hard to prove a condition meets the VA rating guidelines for at least 10% to win SC. For some of us, it could take years. If the VA proposes to reduce someone's rating by 10%, shouldn't they be required to provide proof that the pre-existing condition also met their own criteria for a minimum 10% rating?

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lay medical evidence is not ever accepted by VA if it is IN your favor.

However, anything you say that might, in any way, shape, or form constitute lay medical evidence NOT IN your favor is not just acceptable to them, it is gospel.

If you sent the VA a Nexus letter or IMO from a civilian nurse practioner or physician's assistant, you would probably get shot down for not using a real doctor, preferably one with a board certified specialty in the applicable area of medicine.

If the VA sends you to a VA NP or PA, usually one with no real specialty, just general C&P examinations, hey, they consider that an expert medical opinion no matter the area of medicine.

I still can't get over the poster on this and another site who had a claim in for osteporosis, and a "femoral neck" problem (femoral neck being located in the hip, yes, the HIP), and the C&P examiner did a cervical (NECK!!!) Range of Motion exam, which the ratings team used to deny the claim for the hip.

Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the military did not note it on the exam you didn't have it on entrance. I think that if you get into a battle over pre-existing conditions this is a time to call a lawyer because this can go on for years. The case of personality disorders is a perfect example. The soldier is in for three years and then is kicked out due to PD. This is a supposed pre-existing disorder. So why did it take the military almost three years to find out? The soldier comes home from combat zone and now he has a PD. What BS, but the VA and military cling to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use