Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can Va Verbally Tell You Their Decision?

Rate this question


john49

Question

I talked with a VA rep today on the 800 number about a matter other than my request for reconsideration. During our conversation the matter of my reconsideration came up. He entered my info into his system and he told me that a decision had been reached on Dec 15 and that my request was now in the hands of the people that put together the letters and send out notifications, etc. He said he could not tell me what the decision was. Is that because he did not have it on the computer screen he was looking at or because of VA policy not to disclose that info verbally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

There is a regulation that requires the VA give written notice of a decision, along with reasons and bases for it. However, the VA ignores their own regulation, with the courts blessing, and "deemed denies" Veterans. That is, Vets decisions are denied, "sub silento". In other words they are a silent or secret denial. Its a horrible injustice to Veterans.

Often we think the VA does things the same way at all 57 ROs. They dont. So we cant really answer if a particular RO managers policy is to not give out verbal decisions, because many of them "go their own way" anyway.

That being said, I agree with the ones who do not "give out" verbal decisions, and I will say why. Its not in a Vets best interest. Altho I know Vets are in a hurry to find out, they are best to read the decision in the mail. Why? Well, first of all their wont be a misunderstanding what was said if its in black and white. The Veteran can read it over, 10 times if he so desires, and have his wife read it, and take it to his VSO, if he likes, to explain it. This would not be very likely to happen if the decision was given verbally. If the Vet has the decision in his hand, he is less likely to either think its better, or worse, than it really is.

And he really needs the paper RO decision anyway, if he plans to appeal it. I do think they could be forwarded in IRIS (secure emails) so that Vets could print them if they like, and that would be faster. Because I am hard of hearing I just know I would get some of it wrong if they told me about it verbally.

Still another problem with a Verbal decision is that it would not be enforceable. "But ...you said I got 100 percent"....wouldnt cut it, while saying "The RO decision dated 11/23/2008 awarded 100% SC for PTSD." would be great evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

A truer statement was never made. Each regional office seems to be a little different in how they interpret the rules and how helpful they are to the individual veteran.

That is one of the things that makes it so difficult to help veterans who come here and ask us what the regional office should or should not tell them we know what the law says, but what individual regional offices do we only know from hearing from veterans around the country.

I personally find this particularly frustrating. But perhaps with so many of us spread across the country we can start to figure out how one regional office answers a question as opposed to another and what the laws supposed to be.

Now that would be interesting don't you think?

There is a regulation that requires the VA give written notice of a decision, along with reasons and bases for it. However, the VA ignores their own regulation, with the courts blessing, and "deemed denies" Veterans. That is, Vets decisions are denied, "sub silento". In other words they are a silent or secret denial. Its a horrible injustice to Veterans.

Often we think the VA does things the same way at all 57 ROs. They dont. So we cant really answer if a particular RO managers policy is to not give out verbal decisions, because many of them "go their own way" anyway.

That being said, I agree with the ones who do not "give out" verbal decisions, and I will say why. Its not in a Vets best interest. Altho I know Vets are in a hurry to find out, they are best to read the decision in the mail. Why? Well, first of all their wont be a misunderstanding what was said if its in black and white. The Veteran can read it over, 10 times if he so desires, and have his wife read it, and take it to his VSO, if he likes, to explain it. This would not be very likely to happen if the decision was given verbally. If the Vet has the decision in his hand, he is less likely to either think its better, or worse, than it really is.

And he really needs the paper RO decision anyway, if he plans to appeal it. I do think they could be forwarded in IRIS (secure emails) so that Vets could print them if they like, and that would be faster. Because I am hard of hearing I just know I would get some of it wrong if they told me about it verbally.

Still another problem with a Verbal decision is that it would not be enforceable. "But ...you said I got 100 percent"....wouldnt cut it, while saying "The RO decision dated 11/23/2008 awarded 100% SC for PTSD." would be great evidence.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A truer statement was never made. Each regional office seems to be a little different in how they interpret the rules and how helpful they are to the individual veteran.

That is one of the things that makes it so difficult to help veterans who come here and ask us what the regional office should or should not tell them we know what the law says, but what individual regional offices do we only know from hearing from veterans around the country.

I personally find this particularly frustrating. But perhaps with so many of us spread across the country we can start to figure out how one regional office answers a question as opposed to another and what the laws supposed to be.

Now that would be interesting don't you think?

It's like the NCAA, we enforce the rules we like, when we want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use