Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

‘Treat The Root’ Of Va Claims Backlog"

Rate this question


JHawks

Question

Legion: ‘Treat the root’ of VA claims backlog

By Marty Callaghan - March 3, 2011tetz_030311_p1_1.jpg

Legislative Director Tim Tetz testifies before the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Photo by Craig RobertsTestifying before a March 2 congressional hearing on the Department of Veterans Affairs fiscal 2012 budget proposal, The American Legion called upon VA to “treat the root” of the disability claims backlog problem.

At the hearing, American Legion Legislative Director Tim Tetz told members of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs that VA’s disability claims system “is broken because VA places undue stress on the number of claims processed, and minimal stress on accuracy.”

Referring to VA’s new Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS), Tetz said, “IT tools that are only used to implement the old system will just allow VA to make the same old mistakes faster.

“This budget gives VA quite a bit of money to implement IT programs and initiatives – but does it fix it all the way?” Tetz asked. “VA must build a system that tracks individual error and holds stations accountable for not only the volume of work done, but also the accuracy of the work.”

Repeating concerns expressed at a House hearing last week, Tetz urged Congress to “at least meet the previous levels of funding.” While The American Legion has recommended $2 billion for major and minor VA construction projects, the fiscal 2012 budget calls for about $1.2 billion.

Despite The American Legion’s concerns about the claims backlog and the construction budget, Tetz said the organization “remains cautiously optimistic that the fiscal 2012 budget proposal will meet the needs of our nation’s veterans. We appreciate the efforts VA has made towards addressing the symptoms and issues that currently face our nation’s veterans.”

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The way to deal with automatic approval is complex, but it might be done without major changes to multiple existing laws.

For instance, the at least as likely as not can be applied correctly, (as it should be, and is not) Combat veterans can be actually given the leeway that the laws allow and the VA ignores.

Differences between valid IMOs and C&P results can be automatically resolved in the veteran's favor, as the appeal process often does.

The automatic approval can be based upon existing law when applied in the veteran's favor, something that the VA routinely does not do.

If really doubtful, interim benefits can still be paid.

After all, doubtful cases or obvious fraud can be dealt with as it is now, but without repayment, unless fraud is proven in a civil court.

Lets face it, the VA's present process is more concerned with expending the government's money, and less about providing veterans with the benefits earned and prescribed by the law.

As an organization, the VA and perhaps individually, the VA bureaucrats, (I believe) should be held in contempt of congress, until it's ways are changed.

(I don't believe this will ever happen, because I think that congress and past administrations gave the VA instructions under the table to minimize benefits paid to veterans any way possible.)

Think about what you are saying, John. That if the claim goes past a deadline then that claim is automatically approved. We have VA employees now, at this point, that are afraid to rate a multi-thousand dollar claim, so, if they just casually put the c-file over in the corner somewhere then after 2 or 3 years........it's approved.......by nobody......no harm done............except for the veteran who has now, after this extended waiting period......lost his wife, home, car, self-esteem.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That would help to reduce the claims backlog.

So we have 1: eliminate the mistakes by all parties by a quality assurance who answers to the secretary. and no one at any ro level.

Curtail BVA remands instead of grants or reversals costing years of suffering for deserving vets.

Court remands doing the same.

If a remand is required then the remand goes to the QA folks. Not the original rater.

Break up the AMC and move the Jobs to the regional offices where these folks can help process claims.

Training and continuing education for all Claims handling people from RO to VSO.

Do yearly testing on all VSO's to ensure they are able to do the job.

Do competency testing on all raters and RO personnel to determine the folks who need additional training or need to be canned.

The QA folks need to be a separate entity working for the Secretary and have at least 1 at a paygrade equal to or higher than the Service center Manager.

Edited by jbasser

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry states the nitty gritty:

"we have VA employees now, at this point, that are afraid to rate a multi-thousand dollar claim, so, if they just casually put the c-file over in the corner somewhere then after 2 or 3 years........it's approved.......by nobody......no harm done............except for the veteran who has now, after this extended waiting period......lost his wife, home, car, self-esteem. "

Or they selectively add more time to the stall by sending the claim to the BVA.And then as in my case 6 years after filing my claim, the BVA-since they can READ, awarded it based on evidence the RO had ignored for 6 years.

Then in spite of BVA statement in a past claim I had- that told them to pay me an offset ( a "muti-thousand dollar award) if I succeeded in direct SC death as well as ancilary benefits, the RO stalled that payment for another year and so far as refused to even mentioned the ancillary benefits at all to me.

If I didn't know what those ancillary benefits were myself -I would have never gotten them.They involved Chap 35 new delimitng date and CHAP 35 refund of thousands in tuition , the REPS benefit,I got about 20 thousand, and some other stuff.

I bypassed the VARO and directly contacted VA EDU and REPS etc,sent them the evidence and I got my money.

This RO crap is an absolutely deliberate and calculated effort to withhold money from vets and widows.They only seem to do it when the evidence indicates that 'multiple thousands ' are involved.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use