Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Smcers Pr,john,chulai,rakk Etc

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I found this case while answering a post by Chu Lai.

"Additionally, while the total disability requirement must be met

by a single disability, the 60 percent requirement may be met by

applying the combined rating of the Veteran's remaining

disabilities. See Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet. App.

280 (2008) (noting that "combined ratings to satisfy the second

requirement but not the first"). "

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files3/1026621.txt

Maybe someone else has found this by now-and this case obviously is after Bradley decision.

Are they saying if you have 100% and not TDIU then the VA can combine additional SC to meet the 60 for the 100% plus 60 SC "S" award?

Since the premise of TDIU says Total disability due to individual unemployabilty-should TDIU vets file for and request 100% instead of the TDIU?

Would that make sense?

I have always had the feeling that SMC can be manipulated by the VA to their favor-

and maybe the key to that is in fact that many TDIU vets should be 100% vets but as long as they are deemed TDIU they would need qualify for additional independent 60% SC for "S" unless they can meet the housebound requirements for "S" instead.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Rakkwarrior... gee, what a bummer! I was getting ready to get my resume in order, "educated disabled Veteran, able to work an hour here or there on good days, can't be stressed, must be able to take naps, given time off for VA appointment, must work from home, can use telephone (when I don't lost my voice)....... First job opportunity, fitting with my physical limitations, I was going for!

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rakkwarrior... gee, what a bummer! I was getting ready to get my resume in order, "educated disabled Veteran, able to work an hour here or there on good days, can't be stressed, must be able to take naps, given time off for VA appointment, must work from home, can use telephone (when I don't lost my voice)....... First job opportunity, fitting with my physical limitations, I was going for!

You would be an excellent DAV Chapter or Department Service Officer, those wo are willing to work within their limits, and be certified by the NSO Supervisory staff and National Organization. I really enjoy training and developing people. I really do admire the amount of intelligence and sheer will of the people we have here. Thats why I keep writing. :-)

One very close and dear to be was one of the last WAC's, she's awesome and like a second mother to me ;-) an amazing group of women!

Ne Desit Virtus-Let Valor Not Fail

"These fallen we verify, these fallen we venerate, until at last we form again".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Too bad, WAC, I was sure the VA had a few of those but probably they already have long, long, waiting lists. I'd say try the NSOrgs but ya need to be able to play golf, a couple days a wk, for those!!! roflmao

pr

Rakkwarrior... gee, what a bummer! I was getting ready to get my resume in order, "educated disabled Veteran, able to work an hour here or there on good days, can't be stressed, must be able to take naps, given time off for VA appointment, must work from home, can use telephone (when I don't lost my voice)....... First job opportunity, fitting with my physical limitations, I was going for!

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It seems like the exception to the rule is to work for VA or be a Service Officer.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad, WAC, I was sure the VA had a few of those but probably they already have long, long, waiting lists. I'd say try the NSOrgs but ya need to be able to play golf, a couple days a wk, for those!!! roflmao

pr

Even if I knew how to play golf, it would be way too physical for me now....... Could you just imagine getting paid for something you love to do, and have been doing for free?!!! I would be a NSO in a heart-beat, as the service organizations do not charge our comrades to fight to get them what they rightfully are entitled to. I had a well-know attorney here, and former JAG Officer, ask to hire me as a consultant on Veterans cases, but I find charging Veterans to get them what is rightfully there's to be repugnant.

The Service Organization NSOs that I've known, were all veterans themselves. The very first NSO I met, in Philadelphia (1970's), O.J. Brookes, DAV, impressed me so much, that I've based my "method" of research on him. He left NO stone unturned. I may not have the knowledge/training NSOs have, as they have training, but I put my heart into each case I've worked on, and learn all I can concerning their medical issues, so as to get as much for them the law/regulation allows. I can understand how Rakkarrior felt, when he had to "let down" his friend, as I have a Vet right now, that wants to fight a condition, that even, "reasonable doubt" makes it difficult to fight. I intend to do my best in wording that part of the claim, but even with my optimistic views, it will be a miracle to win, and I told him so. My Vets also understand my conditions, and realize I can be very limited as to how fast I can work their claims. I have already had to advise some how to do their claims, because I was just physically unable to do it myself, at the time.

Sorry, I just realized I hijacked this thread......

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use