Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Other Than Honorable

Rate this question


Navy AT

Question

So i was involved with a girl and she had gotten in a fight with another girl at a bar one night and got injured. Sparring the long details of the story she had to go to the ER and her command found out and i was accused of hitting her even though she said i didn't. a week later i had broken up with her because it was getting involved with my command and she was angry about it. 5 days later my command started to investigate me for article 128 assault and the investigation was completed and the CO decided to charge me with article 128, article 134 and the article for UA since the notified the police and i was arrested the night she started to say i hit her. None of this is true and i never laid a hand on her but she is playing victim real well and has everyone believing her. I go to NJP monday and I am being told that the CO is trying to discharge me with an other than honorable. There is no concrete evidence and all the witnesses are people that she fed this BS to after i broke up with her. So my questions are plain and simple if i do get separated under other than honorable what VA benefits am i able to get with the charges listed above and what must i do to obtain those benefits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

So i was involved with a girl and she had gotten in a fight with another girl at a bar one night and got injured. Sparring the long details of the story she had to go to the ER and her command found out and i was accused of hitting her even though she said i didn't. a week later i had broken up with her because it was getting involved with my command and she was angry about it. 5 days later my command started to investigate me for article 128 assault and the investigation was completed and the CO decided to charge me with article 128, article 134 and the article for UA since the notified the police and i was arrested the night she started to say i hit her. None of this is true and i never laid a hand on her but she is playing victim real well and has everyone believing her. I go to NJP monday and I am being told that the CO is trying to discharge me with an other than honorable. There is no concrete evidence and all the witnesses are people that she fed this BS to after i broke up with her. so my questions are simple what can/should i do to change my discharge? what should i include? how long should i wait? and what people think my chances are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navy AT,

Welcome.

I have merged your 2 topics into one as they pretty much

contain the same stuff.

I don't know if you will find your answers here or not but we will see.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think they can kick you out on OTH for one NJP. If you have long history of NJP and maybe courts martial offense like drugs then maybe they can do it. How is your record? What did the police charge you with? Do you face civilian charges of anything serious? If the girl ended up in the ER and you are found guilty you do have a problem. If the CO wants to kick you out I think he needs more than this one incident unless it is some kind of felony assault. You know the military is its own world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with that:

OTH discharges can involve a lot of factors that require a Character of Service Determination as well as length of time in service must meet the criteria too in the regs found in this link.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

38 CFR 3.12

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use