Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Detailed Or Lite Nod?

Rate this question


JohnO

Question

I'm filing an NOD presenting new information on two previous awards. My original award letter is dated 11 February 2011. My initial award was 70% (30 PTSD + 30 CAD + 20 DMII + 10 tinnitus).

What level of detail is needed in an NOD? I have medical records on hand and can pretty much duplicate the detail used by the rating officer in my original award. Or, I can keep it brief, referencing new non-VA hospital records and VA hospital progress notes.

Last month I had by-pass surgery and cardiology/hospital records support a 60% award (30% increase over original award). I want to NOD the 30% CAD award.

Subsequent to my PTSD C&P exam (June 2010), I've had a number of consultations with VA psychologists/psychiatrists. My VA hospital progress notes support a higher rating. My initial award was 30%, my records support 50%.

Further, I was at the Michael DeBakey VA Hospital in Houston for a scheduled appointment with my primary care VA physician last week. I visited the regional office and a service officer (what's the right term for a VA claims officer?). He helped me apply for the three months recovery from by-pass surgery (100% temporary award). The service officer suggested that I get a letter from my cardiologist supporting three months rehabilitation. My cardiologist has already told me he'd write the letter.

Am I on the right track here? Am I leaving anything out? Do I use a short NOD, referencing new evidence? Or, do I send a detailed NOD, noting all evidence supporting higher awards? Also, do I request a DRO?

My initial claim(s) was filed by a county VSO associated with the American Legion. Since then, other than advice from HADIT, I've been handling my claims myself. Thanks for past and future advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

You can file the NOD and hold off on giving any other info if you want. What will happen is the VARO will send you a letter stating that they received your NOD and then ask for the supporting documentation. I recommend that with the NOD you ask for a hearing so that you can present your case and answer the DRO officer's questions. You should definately get your cardiologist to write a nexus that supports your claim to a higher rating, as well as the same from the psychiatrist treating your PTSD.

Hope this helps,

Bergie

As a combat veteran, or any veteran for that matter!!!

If you thought the fighting was over when you came home, got out, or when the politicians said it was over.

Welcome to the real fight, welcome to VA claims!!!

"Just sayin"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

With the NOD ask specifically for a Personal Hearing with the DRO. Then you can present all your evidence as Bergie suggests. This gives you a chance to look the DRO in the eye and he/she gets to look at you and see you as a person.

With your evidence you want to use the doctors to connect all the dots regarding the nexus. You must have the doctor really spell it out for the VA. If that doctor won't do it get one who will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

File your NOD, however, file a claimfor an increase and temporay 100% based on the by-pass surgery. Cover all bases. You can have a claim and an appeal going at the same time.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further, I was at the Michael DeBakey VA Hospital in Houston

This doesn't have to do with the claim, just wanted to relate that when I

was an infant, Dr.DeBakey was one of my cardiologists.

That was about 50 years ago, he was a great pioneer in this field.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

There are two schools of thought on how detailed to make your NOD:

I tend to favor the one where you use that as an excuse to "argue" your case, presenting evidence as to exactly why you deserve your benefits. I think there is a "medium" length of your NOD, where you get a chance to present all your evidence, but dont "write a book". The courts frown on Veterans submitting more than 25 pages (this does not inculde medical evidence which can be hundreds of pages) ...usually this means the Veteran is "ranting" and telling stories that have no bearing on the outcome. I think an NOD of 1-5 pages is a good length. You should be able to condense what you need to say in less than 5 pages or so, but if it goes 8 or even 10 pages dont fret, if you have read it over thoroughly, checking for redundancy and whether or not it is relevant. One thing that will shorten it, it you dont need to cite the entire regulation, just say something like, "According to CFR 38 4.16, the Veteran is entitled to benefits because (and state why you think this reg applies to your case)" Dont cite the whole regulation..the judge knows how to look it up, if he does not already have it committed to memory.

If its not releveant to the outcome of your claim, then I would not include it. Dont go on and on about stories about what the VAMC nurse told you, if she did not put that in your notes. The VA is going to want documentation of everything, so start with the documentation you have, then build your case on that, rather than expect the Va to take your undocumented testimony. You will build credibility by documenting pretty much everything you say. If you say something that conflicts with the documented evidence, then you better have some pretty good reasons why. Something like this would be ok:

"While C and P Dr. A stated that the Veteran did not suffer from the disease, Dr. B, and Doctor C, have both diagnosed the Veteran with the disease on a medical exam dated 1-4-02 and 1-2-03 respectively.

The other school of thought on NOD's is to just identify the issues, and add evidence "later". I like to do them at the same time, as the VA cant say.."Gee, we did not know about (the medical exams dated 1-4-02 or 1-2-03) ". I then say, "oh yes you did, you see I mentioned them in my NOD dated 11-12-06 ".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use