Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ao Claim Settled, But What About Reimbursement?

Rate this question


NSA-Saigon-ET

Question

Hi All,

My nehmer claim for AO/IHD was granted at 10% with an EED of 2003

I am just curious and so have to ask the question concerning treatment cost paid by veteran for IHD treatment.

I have been under VA care for some time now and my Nehmer claim has a EED going back to 2003. So I have been paying for medication and testing since that time from my pocket.

Is there any re-imbursement process from the VA or is that money just gone?

Any answers greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I had what I thought was a heart attack and then was discovered to be Angina. This was in 1994 and I have had excellent care by both VA and outside doctors.

I will file for an increase later on after most of the Nehmer cases are settled. I also have many other issues on appeal which are more important now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all who responded,

There is a section in the VA rating decision that has a toll free number to call for reimbursement of fees and medications. I called it and they filed a request for audit of my account going back to 2003. The person I spoke with said it might take 30 days and that they should call me when finished. He also gave me the

audit number for reference. I will not hold my breath on the 30 day time frame , but will check back using the reference number.

I strongly suggest anyone who had a Nehmer claim settled and may be due reimbursement of fees and medications or copays to check on any reimbursement due.

Hi All,

My nehmer claim for AO/IHD was granted at 10% with an EED of 2003

I am just curious and so have to ask the question concerning treatment cost paid by veteran for IHD treatment.

I have been under VA care for some time now and my Nehmer claim has a EED going back to 2003. So I have been paying for medication and testing since that time from my pocket.

Is there any re-imbursement process from the VA or is that money just gone?

Any answers greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is great advice for anyone with potential co pay refund under Nehmer- NSA Saigon.

I am glad they even gave you a toll free number.

Yes, if you feel the 10% doesn't reflect any future IHD problems or any secondarys ( and I hope you dont have any) by all means file for a higher IHD rating.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

10% for IHD is an obvious "low ball". (Or the medical tests needed to actually show the amount of damage were not done, or the results were not considered.)

IHD is damage caused by restricted blood flow to the heart. It also encompasses Cardiovascular disease, (CHD), and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) among others.

"METS", as used by the VA, is not a very accurate measurement of heart damage or "efficiency". Remember that the average healthy individual does not really fully stress the heart during "normal" activity.

A few years back, the USAF was kicking athletic enlisted men out because their heart was not reacting sufficiently to the USAF's retention stress tests.

"Gold Standard" tests are such things as a heart cath, or a chemical stress test with dye, imaging, and combined with electrocardiograph results.

When a chemical stress test is done properly, heart failure is easily seen. Real time imaging actually shows when the heart starts to fail, and how it's failing. The real time image changes often occur

before or co-incident with changes in the electrocardiograph traces (also real time).

Normally, the patient feels a stronger heartbeat during the test, may or may not have some discomfort (usually due to a mild reaction to the dye used), and possibly sort of an undefined uneasy feeling.

A precautionary drug sometimes called for is Prednisone. It is usually prescribed for up to several days preceding the stress test. Basically, it helps reduce or eliminate a possible reaction to the imaging dye.

(Yes, I've been through these tests as a patient, more than once.)

The stressor chemical's effects can be reversed within a very short time.

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use