Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fuduciary Mess Indictment

Rate this question


Berta

Question

“Employee of Tuskegee Attorney Indicted for Embezzling Funds From Veterans’ Accounts

Montgomery, Alabama - Joy Farmer, 41, of Columbus, Georgia, was arraigned today on

federal bank fraud charges arising out of her embezzlement of funds from veterans’ bank

accounts, Leura G. Canary, United States Attorney, announced today.

The indictment, which was unsealed today, alleges that Farmer was employed as an

administrative assistant for an attorney in Tuskegee, Alabama (the “Attorney”). The Attorney

had been appointed as a fiduciary for several individuals receiving veterans benefits pursuant to

the Fiduciary Program of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), which

oversees benefits paid to beneficiaries who are incapable of handling their funds–either because

they are minors or because of injury, disease, or old age. For each beneficiary, the Attorney

established a bank account to receive VA benefits and pay appropriate expenses (the

“Beneficiary Accounts”).

The indictment further alleges that between January 1999 and May 2004, Farmer

embezzled approximately $626,101.67 from 25 different Beneficiary Accounts by writing 327

checks to herself from the Beneficiary Accounts, forging the Attorney’s signature on the checks,

depositing the checks in her own bank account, and using the funds to pay personal expenses. To

conceal her conduct, Farmer would (a) deposit checks drawn on one Beneficiary Account into a

different Beneficiary Account, and (b) deposit funds intended for one beneficiary to be deposited

into the Beneficiary Account of a different beneficiary.

The indictment charges Farmer with eight counts of bank fraud, each of which carries a

statutory maximum sentence of 30 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $1 million, and an order of

restitution.

An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and defendants are

presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

At her arraignment today, Farmer pleaded not guilty and was released by Chief

Magistrate Judge Susan R. Walker on a $25,000 unsecured bond. Trial was set for August 22,

2011 in Opelika before Chief United States District Judge Mark E. Fuller.

The case was investigated by the VA’s Office of Inspector General. The case is being

prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Andrew O. Schiff and Gray M. Borden.”

http://www.justice.gov/usao/alm/press/current_press/2011_04_06_farmer.pdf

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Wonder if they will show the connection between VARO and "The Attorney"

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the court has to assign you a guardian you are in trouble. There are professional guardians who do it for a living. These people are in for the money and don't give a damn about the people whose lives they rule. The professional guardians stick you in a nursing home and try to get your relatives to let them dispose of your assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This could only be the tip of the iceburg. There are a lot of crooks out there and these crimes of opportunity are very common..

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At her arraignment today, Farmer pleaded not guilty and

was released by Chief Magistrate Judge Susan R. Walker on a $25,000 unsecured bond.

http://www.justice.g...4_06_farmer.pdf

Here she has stolen the possessions of these veterans and this

obtuse judge has released her on a mere 25K UNSECURED BOND.

If the thief doesn't show for court this #@^*&!G Judge should have to pay restitution

to the victims.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here she has stolen the possessions of these veterans and this

obtuse judge has released her on a mere 25K UNSECURED BOND.

If the thief doesn't show for court this #@^*&!G Judge should have to pay restitution

to the victims.

JMHO

I think that the VA should make the Veterans get full restiturtion and than try and colect from the corooks who were stealing the money.

By the way unfortunately when someone is given the power to manage money for another many seem to think that they are owed for doing this. I know of many cases when a trusted family member has stolen funds same as this woman did.

I think that the VA should be very careful about making a Veteran a fiduciary and they should require a bond when they do it

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use