Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tiger Team

Rate this question


grent

Question

I FOUND OUT MY CLAIM OR SOME OF MY CLAIM IS IN A PLACE CALLED THE TIGER TEAM CLEVELAND OHIO

WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW TO GET MY CLAIM SENT BACK TO THE LOCAL VARO

I AM CONSIDERING FIRING MY LAWYER HE HASN'T SENT ME A THING IN THE MAIL

ANY THOUGHTS HERE WOULD BE HELPFUL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I have heard good things about the Tiger Team, and dont recommend trying to switch things around once you are there. They are the experience problem solving unit at the VA. Usually this means you have been recommended for the TT by someone at the VA.

I have also heard of people who have tried to get their claim with the TT, but I am not so sure a Veteran can successfully recommend himself for TT.

This is probably good news for you.

You can check your contract, but even if your contract says the lawyer is paid when the RO awards benefits (without an appeal), remember the court has to approve payment to the lawyer. While I have wondered the same thing myself, if you hire a lawyer and the RO (or TT) awards you benefits (without going through appeals) you may not owe the lawyer a dime. You can call him and ask him..if he is well experienced in VA law, he will likely know the answer.

There is something called a "Joint Remand" This is when the parties get together and smoke a joint to decide your benefits instead of consuming Vodka like they usually do. lol. No, its when your lawyer and the lawyers representing the VA agree to a remand. Its kinda of a way the VA admits its mistakes without admitting its mistakes, if you know what I mean. Its the VA equivilant of "settling out of court". You know. someone sues someone for a half million dollars. Well, sometimes they say..gee...your case against us is not that good, but it will cost us to defend this anyway, so how about $50,000 and everyone goes away, and no one admits guilt. Sometimes its a good idea to take their offer as appeals can run for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Grent,

The only time I would get rid of my lawyer would be to get another one. I would never , never, EVER, use a DAV rep over a lawyer. Remember that the DAV is paid by the VA if I am correctly stating it. The Justice Dept lawyers are paid by the Government to defeat you. You have a lawyer at least to EQUAL the playing field and I will tell you that you need every edge you can because the VA will "forget" , lie , deny , wait you out, and do whatever they can to keep from having to give you any benefits if they can. I would never risk going against them without a lawyer.

This site has some incredible people on it. The advice you receive is to help you get your benefits and many people here have done so without a lawyer , but if you have to go along the path of appeals and deadlines and remands and all of the other stuff VA throws at you, you need to be ready to go bear hunting with a bear gun. DAV is not a bear gun. I went that route with them and got their advice which cost me nothing but wasted time. I have a lawyer in claims and also one in malpractice and will probably get another one on any appeal with my Section 1151. I like bear hunting, its dangerous and the bears can hurt you , especially if you are undergunned. Oh yes ,,,, I don't like bear meat as it is way too strong tasting for me. If you have not tasted it , you will probably pass after the first time you try it. Same thing with the VA. As Robert Rourke the author said and the name of his famous book which I have in my library.......USE ENOUGH GUN.

My advice is if you don't like your lawyer then try to get another one. If you notice here at Hadit, Bergman and Moore are very well thought of and sometimes they are on the SVR show on Wed. Above all though please remember to NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would stick with the lawyer and not risk working if my P&T is for mental condition unless I cleared that with my lawyer. Your lawyer may have some claim to some of that SMC money. With lost records maybe there is a question about EED. Is so you want your lawyer on that since the more you get paid the more he gets paid. I agree with the Captain. Call your lawyer's office and bug him until you get a response. However, if your lawyer will not cooperate then go interview another lawyer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only have this to say about your DAV advice. I am old 67 and I have had 100% P&T rating for 18 years and I would not consider working even if I could. Any mental rating for 100% is subject to review. If your DAV SO is wrong look at what you are risking. If I understand the lost records were found.

My opinion is stick with your lawyer its in the lawyers interest to finish this out also.

Good Luck.

OKAY PETE ILL SEND THE LAWYER A LETTER AND LEAVE THE FILE WITH THE TIGER TEAM I FIGURE MY RETRO IS ABOUT 400, $ 490,000 IN BACK RETRO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Good Luck I think that you are doing the right thing.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use