Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Earlier Effective Date For Tdiu

Rate this question


BlakePaigeStone

Question

I just saw ...yesterday, (on the VA's eBenefits web-site), that my claim has been moved, from the 'decision-phase,' to the 'closed-phase.' Is it unusual for a claim to skip the 'notification-phase?' Is this an indication of anything 'negative?'

I filed the claim on May 20, 2010; and ...it was for an award of retro-active TDIU benefits ...due to CUE. I've been rated at '70%/TDIU' ...for PTSD, since 2002. I was service-connected in 1995, at 30% ...however, I received all of my ratings at the same time ...in 2002. So, the VA rated me from 1995, to 2002, at 30%; then, raised/increased my rating to 70% in 2002 ...plus, awarded me TDIU - P&T. This was all done at the very same time; and ...I received everything in the very same envelope ...in May, 2002.

I claimed that the CUE was made because of all of the 'informal claims' for TDIU, that were ignored, between 1995 and 2002; including my VA Medical Center doctor's diagnosis, (inpatient PTSD program), of 'PTSD-Chronic - w/Unemployable' ...upon my discharge from the hospital, in December of 1995.

I claimed CUE since the claim had been 'closed' since June of 2003. However, the regional office followed-up with a request for me to complete a 'TDIU form,' and send it back. So, the CUE issue was by-passed ...right?! Could they have re-opened my old claim ...because of 'new and material evidence' ...instead? I was also awarded SSDI, very shortly after my VA award.

Does this smell like it could result in 'bad news' for me ...when I get my decision, in a couple of weeks? Does it look like I should prepare for an appeal?

Will '...anyone,' please advise. Thank you!

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a lawyer to review your CUE. If you can find a lawyer who will take your claim you are headed for the BVA/Court of veterans appeals. If you just send this up without some expert doing research and a brief your claim is going to languish for a few years and then be dismissed. The VA does not even mention your "PTSD/unemployable" diagnosis. Did they have that record before them when they made the initial rating back in 1995? When you get your C-File and look at the decision it would be important to find out if they had that evidence, but just chose to ignore it. Be aware that you do have an uphill battle. You really have two things you must show were made in error: 1. Your rating of 30% was an error. You should have been rated at least 70%. 2. You had an inferred claim for TDIU because of that rating error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get a lawyer to review your CUE. If you can find a lawyer who will take your claim you are headed for the BVA/Court of veterans appeals. If you just send this up without some expert doing research and a brief your claim is going to languish for a few years and then be dismissed. The VA does not even mention your "PTSD/unemployable" diagnosis. Did they have that record before them when they made the initial rating back in 1995? When you get your C-File and look at the decision it would be important to find out if they had that evidence, but just chose to ignore it. Be aware that you do have an uphill battle. You really have two things you must show were made in error: 1. Your rating of 30% was an error. You should have been rated at least 70%. 2. You had an inferred claim for TDIU because of that rating error.

Thanks ...for all of your input.

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a pending claim filed, currently, for a copy of my c-file; as ...its effective date is September, 2010. I don't know if I'll ever get a copy, though; because ...it was over two-folders in size, when I last saw it at my C&P exam, in 2001/2002.

Just for the record - a request for a copy of one's c-file - is not a claim, it is a FOIA request.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember right, sometime in the mid 90's, there was an amendment

to the regulations in the rating criteria for mental health disorders.

You posted something to the effect that (in something that sounds like your hospital discharge summary)

the doctor wrote the word's "chronic" and "unemployability".

The VBA decision maker may have made a poor decision in adjudication and weighed this evidence as merely isolated findings.

Also, I haven't seen anything posted yet, showing that this doctor wrote anything at all in regards to medical rationale, that would

provide support to the portion,in relation to unemployability.

Claimants can surely have evidence in their c-files that MIGHT get adjudicated as an informal claim

and I believe only VBA can infer a claim issue.

Without having anything posted yet verbatim from prior decisions, I am in agreement with Hoppy

that conjecture and I will add this is all nothing more than mere speculation at this point.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record - a request for a copy of one's c-file - is not a claim, it is a FOIA request.

Yes, I thought so ...too; but ...the 'eBenefits web-site' has my F.O.I.A. request listed as... another 'claim,' that is currently in the development-phase. When the VA replies to me, about my C-file request ...via the IRIS system, they always say that my F.O.I.A. 'claim' is being processed, etc.

Thanks for your input.

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember right, sometime in the mid 90's, there was an amendment

to the regulations in the rating criteria for mental health disorders.

You posted something to the effect that (in something that sounds like your hospital discharge summary)

the doctor wrote the word's "chronic" and "unemployability".

The VBA decision maker may have made a poor decision in adjudication and weighed this evidence as merely isolated findings.

Also, I haven't seen anything posted yet, showing that this doctor wrote anything at all in regards to medical rationale, that would

provide support to the portion,in relation to unemployability.

Claimants can surely have evidence in their c-files that MIGHT get adjudicated as an informal claim

and I believe only VBA can infer a claim issue.

Without having anything posted yet verbatim from prior decisions, I am in agreement with Hoppy

that conjecture and I will add this is all nothing more than mere speculation at this point.

JMHO

I totally agree. I do, however, remember carrying around a copy of my doctor's discharge summary/report, right after my discharge ...in 1995; and ...reading a copy of it that was in my C-file, during the time that I was fighting for my initial rating of service-connection.

I used to possess a copy of my C-file; but ...many moves & relocations, across the globe, designated my big, two-volume, (at that time), to the trash-heap ...somewhere. One's mental-state when you finally receive that grant of service-connection and retro-check, after a seven-year fight with the VA, makes you execute some very stupid decisions! (like not ever expecting to have to deal, with the VA ...ever again!) As I mentioned, previously '...if I'd been in my right mind, I would have appealed the rating decision ...then!' I was too ...mentally drained, and afraid ...that I'd lose it! Crazy ...huh?!

The last message from the VARO-Honolulu, about my C-file request ...last-week, was... 'that I'd be receiving it within the next 60-to-90 days.' That's where all my ammunition is located; and ...I'm sure that much has been overlooked. I, on the other-hand, 'lived' that paperwork, and ...know exactly what, in my C-file, I'm looking for. I was also informed that my C-file is now three-volumes in size; and ...will be shipped to me, via Fed-X, ('my' expense ...I'm sure), due to my U.S. Embassy FPO mail-system restrictions on weight.

Taking possession of my C-file ...will resolve all of the issues I'm now encountering. *"Never discard your C-file!!!"*

Thanks for all of your input; and ...please stay in-touch ...ok?!

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use