Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Proposed Decrease Due To Cue

Rate this question


mags1023

Question

I have 2 issues on appeal since 2008 and an NOD/DRO review on my claim for headaches from last year, so what do I get in the mail yesterday? A letter from the VA stating that they made a CUE when they granted me Cervical Radiculopathy last year. It looks like they are saying it is basically the same thing as my Carpal Tunnel Syndrome! It says that it considers the Cervical Radiculopathy as pyramiding on my Carpal Tunnel. I think they are saying my symptoms are the same. This is redicilous! I have pain and numbness in my shoulders that radiate down my arms. I have neck pain and headaches from it. I don't think that would be caused by Carpal Tunnel.

I know I need to request a hearing, but can I send an NOD in at the same time disagreeing with their findings?? Some rating specialist probably got an end of year bonus for this by trying to cheat me out of 10%. It says my rating will decrease from 90% to 80%. I feel like Joe Fraizer after going 15 rounds with Muhammad Ali! They are beating me down. I want to keep working, because I know if I stop going to work and sit around all day, my depression is going to get worse and worse. But, I am thinking about filing for TDIU. Any thoughts are appreciated.

s/Mags1023

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

They are to rate the nerves separate unless they rate a nerve group.

The CTS comes from c5 / c6 nerve root. IS it median or Ulnar?

You need an IMO immediatly to offset this bull they are trying to crap on you.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they're CUEing their decision, then they're going off the c and p and medical evidence already existence. As such, the rater is interpreting something that isn't supposed to be interpreted as he is interpreted. Frankly, the carpal tunnel syndrome is caused by compression on the median nerve, and Cervical Radiculopathy --no matter if it is of the nerve roots where median nerve originates-- is distinctly different.

I don't think that the Rater is arguing this. I think the Rater is arguing that this pyramids which means the veteran needs to argue why it doesn't, as such an IMO wouldn't be necessarily beneficial, but swaying the VARO to the interpretation that the veteran deems accurate is. This is about rating law not medical opinion.

My two cents, may be countered by others, but I am adding it to spark the intellectuals and add to the discussion, perhaps something can come from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks J. I don't have the letter in front of me, but I believe they are saying both the CTS and Cerv Rad are due to median nerve compression. I have an appointment with my County Rep, but know you guys on hadit know more than him. I/we just have to spoonfeed them the info. Seems like you have to have a rep here when you working with Bay Pines, FL. What a joke this region is. I never thought I would miss the Houston region! I'll work on my Doc for an IMO.

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Scscrewed;

you're right, they are going off of the C&P examiners rationale and taking it as gospel completely ignoring all of the other exams I have had where I complain about the pain and numbness in my neck, shoulders, arms and my headaches. I would think the rater is out of line with this proposal, but I don't think (I know) there is no one supervising the help! It just causes us more pain and suffering.

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Wow. Cue is a "rare kind of error" and cant be based on a disagreement on how you were rated. Cue must be "undebatable", it must be based on the laws at the time, and it has to be an "outcome determanitive" error.

You need to request the hearing. You dont "NOD" a proposed reduction because a proposed reduction is not a final decision, and NOD's apply only to final decisions. You can dispute the proposed reduction and ask for a hearing.

Im not sure, have not read your file, but it sounds like their CUE probably wont stick. Veterans have a tough time making CUE's stick, and so should the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks BroncoVet. That's what I am thinking also, but you know how the VA always makes things easier for themselves. Kind of like we have deadlines and they don't!

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use