Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Rate this question


Guest terrysturgis

Question

Guest terrysturgis

I'm not an familiar with what would be considered IHD and I am helping a vet file his claims. Question is, is Congestive Heart Failure considered to be IHD and should he file a claim for CHF. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am pretty sure CHF is not considered IHD. However, I think it really takes an autopsey to determine cause of death. If you die from a heart attack due to narrowing of blood vessels to the heart even if you have CHF then that might be IHD as cause of actual death. Of course if you have DMII and also CHF due to DMII then if you die from CHF that would be SC.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IHD for VA purposes is defined in this forum under a search.

I am starting to have problems with the new board and cannot copy and paste the link.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope this helps.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files3/1124555.txt

Effective August 31, 2010, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs has determined that there is a presumptive positive association between exposure to herbicides and ischemic heart disease (IHD) (including, but not limited to, acute, subacute, and old myocardial infarction; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease (including coronary spasm) and coronary bypass surgery; and stable, unstable and Prinzmetal's angina), under 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e). See 75 Fed. Reg. 53202 (Aug. 21, 2010).

Notably, the term IHD does not include hypertension or peripheral manifestations of arteriosclerosis such as peripheral vascular disease or stroke, or any other condition that does not qualify within the generally accepted medical definition of IHD. 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e) Note 3.

The Board initially notes that the appellant has not received notice of these potentially favorable changes in law. As such, the Board will remand this case to provide the appellant notice as required by 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.159.

The Board next notes that medical opinion is deemed necessary to decide this claim. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103A(d). In this respect, the Veteran held a diagnosis of coronary artery disease prior to his death which may be deemed of service-connected origin under the revised provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 3.309(e), effective August 31, 2010. However, the Veteran was also diagnosed with long-standing hypertension which is specifically excluded as presumptively due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran's private medical records list both coronary artery disease and hypertension as risk factors for the Veteran's CVA.

As reflected in final rule comments, the definition of IHD is technical in nature. VA has defined IHD as "an inadequate supply of blood and oxygen to a portion of the myocardium; it typically occurs when there is an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand." 75 Fed. Reg. at 53204, citing Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (Harrison's Online, Chapter 237, Ischemic Heart Disease, 2008). VA emphasized that the definition of IHD is limited to conditions which directly affect the myocardium (or muscles of the heart). Id.

Thus, on remand, the VA examiner is requested to determine whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities materially or substantially contributed to the cause of his death, including clarification as to whether the Veteran suffered from ischemic heart disease.

Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action:

1. Provide the appellant notice consistent with 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(b) regarding the recently finalized regulations which added ischemic heart disease to the list of those diseases that may be presumed as due to herbicide exposure.

2. After providing the appellant an appropriate period of time to provide additional evidence and/or information, forward the claims folder to a cardiology specialist who is requested to provide opinion on the following questions:

a) whether it is at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater degree of probability) that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities of PTSD, bilateral hearing loss and coronary artery disease materially or substantially contributed to the cause of his death; and

b) whether the Veteran suffered from ischemic heart disease at the time of his death and, if so, whether it is at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater degree of probability) that ischemic heart disease materially or substantially contributed to the cause of his death?

A "contributory cause of death" is one which contributed substantially or materially to cause death, or aided or lent assistance to the production of death.

The term "as likely as not" does not mean within the realm of possibility. Rather, it means that the weight of medical evidence both for and against a conclusion is so evenly divided that it is medically sound to find in favor of causation as to find against causation.

For VA purposes, the term "ischemic heart disease" is defined as an inadequate supply of blood and oxygen to a portion of the myocardium; it typically occurs when there is an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand. The term ischemic heart disease does not include hypertension or peripheral manifestations of arteriosclerosis such as peripheral vascular disease or stroke, or any other condition that does not qualify within the generally accepted medical definition of ischemic heart disease.

A rationale must be provided for the opinion offered and, if the requested opinion cannot be provided on a medical or scientific basis and without invoking processes relating to guesses or judgment based upon mere conjecture, the reviewing physician should clearly and specifically so specify and explain why this is so.

3. Thereafter, readjudicate the claim. If any benefit sought on appeal remains denied, the appellant and her representative should be furnished a supplemental statement of the case and an appropriate period of time to respond.

The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999).

This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2009).

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest terrysturgis

Friends, I appreciate the info. What's bugging me is this vet's VA doctor says he does not have a claim and not to file after a two minute exam. I believe we will start with hearing loss, tinnitus, heart problems and he has had a rash since being in country. Time to get to work. He is scheduled for an Agent Orange exam. We will get a copy. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Terry ask the Vet what caused his CHF?

Obviously he has had some heart related problems in the past. Has he ever had Angioplasty or stints put in. He needs a diagnosis of CAD. That would make the CHF an issue on th e severity of the heart disease.

I take this Vet is alive and kicking. I am confused about the death stuff in this topic.

Basse

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use