Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can New (Supporting) Evidence Be Introduced At The C&p?

Rate this question


BFR

Question

Reading through this forum I'm not sure if it's allowed or not. Does anyone know where the "ten commandments" for C&P exams can be found?

TIA!

_______________

I want to thank TBird, carlie, pete992, Pete53, and Berta for all the help and advice they've given me over the years. And also to the Elders, Moderators, and Admins for the work they do. I want you to know that you are truly appreciated!

-- Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Forgetting about any possible regulations, and other issues - -

It depends on the examiner! The examiner may or may not look at, or may or may not accept any evidence, or may or may not note the evidence in the exam report.

The examiner may or may not have even looked at the existing medical records.

It's not uncommon for the examiner to "shortcut" the requirements of a specific exam.

It's not uncommon for an examiner to make an unsupported and incomplete exam report.

Examiners stay examiners and get raises based upon the VA's ideas, not what might be correct, fair or reasonable.

An example is an examiner saying that HBP is "essential", rather than saying "It's as likely as not" that the HBP is connected as secondary to an SC-able condition, even when

current medical practice and references relate it to the condition.

With that said - - If you have recent medical evidence that is indicative of the current severity of a condition, by all means make it available to the examiner.

In many cases, the examiner is less qualified than the source of the medical evidence. IE specialist's diagnosis vs a NP examiner's opinon.

A VA RO may take the less qualified examiner's opinion as gospel when it allows a denial. Appeals generally accept the most qualified doctor's records and diagnosis.

Parts of a Nehmer ruling on my case actually (but indirectly) cited mistakes made by the RO in a previous denial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is fine to take evidence to your C&P exam, however, make sure that you send a copy of the documentation to the Regional Office. That way you can be sure that it is a part of your claims file. The examiner many not attached the medical information to the C-file. Better safe than sorry.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When you hand your new evidence to the C&P doctor you have no proof that you submitted it unless the exam doctor gives you a receipt and I bet he/she won't do that. Many don't even want to look at previous evidence because they want to have an independent look at you with no preconceived notions. At least that is what one told me. I think he was just lazy and need to cram in a few more exams before lunch. You need a papertrail to prove you submitted new evidence. VARO's are great at losing evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is fine to take evidence to your C&P exam, however, make sure that you send a copy of the documentation to the Regional Office. That way you can be sure that it is a part of your claims file. The examiner many not attached the medical information to the C-file. Better safe than sorry.

Ditto on sharon's reply -

Also, whatever you take for the examiner - take COPIE to leave with them. If the examiner says

I already have your file - kind of off the cuff just say something like, well I just got these copies to

leave with you because I don't think they've been included in my file yet and they may say - alright just

leave them here. That's the best way I know of, but as was also posted - they don't have to let you leave

these records with them. Remember the saying you get more with sugar than vinegar : - )

Be sure to follow up by submitting the same copies to your VARO and get a date stamped copy at your VARO.

Also - keep it to a minimum by just taking the strongest evidence with you.

The examiner (IMO) is more likely to accept 10-15 pages of info. versus 100 pages.

When they see you come in with a thick stack - their first thought is - ain't going to happen.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

These C&P exam doctors get paid piece rate. They are not going to read 100 pages of evidence from a vet they talked to for 15 minutes. They are paid to give a picture of your disability as they see it on such and such a date. Then they give an opinion about your disability being SC or not SC. Better to put more effort into finding good IMO doctors or the opinions of your own private doctor if you have one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use