Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

The Goverment So Cheap

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Just as I said VA cheap. They might prove me wrong, I go last week to the Va clinic to see the Heme-onc. This to see if thet would give Zytiga for my PC. They yes if I would come in for blood test. Where do I sign up. One month cost $5,600 America Money.

But I have not got this yet!

Teac, You are about the Simvastation 40 mg , but mine are a prefect break everytime. NOT

VA is Cheap, look in the dictionary under cheap , and said " term for VA Hospital"

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The pill cutter is such a wonderful device. It cuts the 25 mg Carvedilol so I can take the 12.5 mg in the morning and evening.

There is one problem, I lose about .5 to 1 mg every time I cut the pill. It fall apart. I try to keep all the piece's, but then it hard to put all the piece's together for 12.5mg

In a month's time i will loose 1 pill or more to this conditions. So each month I take from the next month pills!!!wacko.png It no big deal, it's only my blood pressure medicineblink.png

Did I say the Government is so Cheap!

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

They send you to a combat zone and as an extra bonus the VA, and government spits in your face and cheats you on nickles and dimes. All existing governments and administrations are the same only some are worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

About 4 years ago, I found a pill spliter that was given to my wife at one of her doctor appoints at BAMC. I had never received a prescription that required me to split a pill, so I asked my wife what was this.. and she explained that she had to cut her pills in half. She also indicated, but they never cut equally and often times crumble.. so she didn't think she was getting the proper dose.

Some time later my va doc prescribed me simvastatin 40MG and it stated take 1/2 tablet at bedtime.. problem was I never received a pill spliter. My wife gave me her's to use and half of the time the pills crumble...

Now recently the doctor lowered my script to 20MG and take 1/2 half at bedtime.... wait a minute why was I getting 40MG tabs before if they have 20MG tabs ( thats the stupity of the va)

The 20MG tabs are oval shapped, are coated and have no score lines.... have you ever tried to split a small oval pill in half? it doesn't work very well especially if you have arthritis it is almost impossible to pick up the pill before it is split, and split is so small just falls out of the cutter.. I think I'll just toss them in the trash.. with my lung problems I am more apt to die from lack of oxygen than I am from to much cholesterol.

As to that va tech assement program that was posted.. It was generated in Boston.. Texas is not likely to abide by it.

Consider this - - -

A higher dosage (double) pill has only a small if any price increase. In some cases, it may actually be cheaper.

If a veteran must pay "co-pay", the rate is based upon a 30 day supply. So, the VA can collect twice the co-pay for

the same number of pills. To the best of my knowledge, the VA has never implemented provisions that allow for "reduced co-pay"

in the pill splitting area. The VA also doesn't let such things as pill coatings, extended release, approved use, drug licensing, etc. stand in the way.

I recently tried to get the local VAMC to provide some light on the matter.

What I found was that the pill splitting bit is based upon local "initiative" policy, whatever that is, and there were supposedly no documents defining a "standard policy".

Evidently, the VAMC chief pharmacist calls the shots. What I'd bet is that getting my hands on a written list, and making it public is not considered in the VAMCs best interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It really should be the person taking the meds call not the VA's. If a Veteran wants to split pills that is there business. I can see someone who makes copays wanting that choice but I don't want to split pills.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use