Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Increase To 70% Finally Approved

Rate this question


jet187

Question

Hey all,

thanks to all the great advice & people on this forum, I received the big white envelope from the Regional yesterday saying I was given temp. 100% SC for 2 months March 30 to June 3 due to hospitalization over 21 days. An evaluation of 70% is assigned from June 2011 going forward.

I put my claim for increase for 100% P&T immediately after I was discharged from the PTSD program in Lyons in June 2011. Had my Increase C&P in July, then waited until yesterday.

My next step is to decide if I should NOD the decision or just go ahead and apply for TDIU.

Couldn't have done it without the support & advice I have read on this amazing site.

Thanks Brothers & Sisters!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

jet187 - why did they deny 100% (or TDIU, an inferred issue, when they awarded the 70%)??? Please post the info from the "reasons and bases" section of the decision. Thanks!

pr

Hey all,

thanks to all the great advice & people on this forum, I received the big white envelope from the Regional yesterday saying I was given temp. 100% SC for 2 months March 30 to June 3 due to hospitalization over 21 days. An evaluation of 70% is assigned from June 2011 going forward.

I put my claim for increase for 100% P&T immediately after I was discharged from the PTSD program in Lyons in June 2011. Had my Increase C&P in July, then waited until yesterday.

My next step is to decide if I should NOD the decision or just go ahead and apply for TDIU.

Couldn't have done it without the support & advice I have read on this amazing site.

Thanks Brothers & Sisters!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with PR re; posting the info. Depending on the reasons they based their denial on, you might be able to rebut that, via the DRO review with a NOD. It'll be a lot better and faster to have it approved there, than have it go to BVA for approval.

Coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip & Cooter,

I was originally 50%. Then went into the PTSD program for 2 months in April-June. I was advised by the VA docs to put in for 100% when I got out which I did in June. Had my Increase C&P in July.

They shot me down for 100% in the Reasons for Decision as stated:

"A higher evaluation of 100 % is not warranted unless there is a total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as:

Gross impairment in thought process or communications

Persistent delusions or hallucinations

Grossly inappropriate behavior

Persistent danger of hurting self or others

intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living(including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene)

Disorientation to time or place,memory loss for names of close relatives,own occupation, or own name.

I think I have at least 3 of the symptoms listed above now.

They said my GAF was 45. A range of 41-50 indicates serious symptoms, or any serious impairment in social,occupational, or school functioning.

The also said" The overall evidentiary record shows that the severity of your disability most closely approximates the criteria for a 70 % disability evaluation."

I did go back to work shortly after being discharged from the program,because of family financial issues but I work 2 days a week now. Maybe they denied me the 100% because I am still working I guess.

I want to talk to my VA Pysch Doc when I see him in a few weeks & see what he has to say. He has been supportive in the past, wrote me a support letter when I put in for the increase.

The Decision letter does not say anything about 70% & applying for TDIU.

Notorious Kelly, sorry I don't know how to post this in the Success Stories forum. Apologize if I posted in the wrong forum.

What should I do?

Thanks for any advice given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrat!!!

Operation Iraqi Freedom 07-08

40% lower back, 10% migraines, 10% depression, 10% dermatitis 0% residuals of right foot, 0% esophagitis & 0% hypertension

"To care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan"

- Abraham Lincoln

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use