ptsd New 3;159 Supports Ptsd

[Guest anfrnkie]

hi guys i got a ssoc as i am 100% ptsd granted in 2003 i appeald earlier effective date to 52-55 navy in ssoc under 3;159 states c indicates that clamed disabilty or symptoms may be associated with the established event,injury,or disease in service or with another service-connected disability. paragraph 4,1 c could be safisfied by competent evidence showing ptds treatment for a condition,or other possible association with military service,there is a lot more under 3;159,in my case i am going back to air force 46-46 at 100%,ptsd is already granted will apply to 3;159,back to 52-56 my ptsd is 4 -25 -52 wasp sinking hobson.i hope i have given you help with 3;159- dept of vets affairs assistance in developing claims it sure help me

[Guest anfrnkie]

Frank,

People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones !

" i don;t need you help or wings i have seen more action then you and wings put together,va is taking care of my claims and to give you some feedback for your pea brain,i was a staff sergeant in air force at age 22,wings can you top that record?i am 100%for air force cfr ch5 part 3 m21-1 wings i also got my insurance back,va is working on air force on air force compensation with out the help of a s/o,i took care of it myself, navy 52-56 i have been around the world twice 92,000 miles i have seen places you only read about i have been to the north and south pole crossed the equator twice i hold member ship to many clubs from all over the world, i also watched 179 men got to their graves on the deck of the wasp when wasp cut hobson in half i listened to cries for help of men in the water, i am 100%ptsd for that night,an you vik17 what help could you give me vik 17? you and wings make a good pair nosense and nonsence do not respond to any of my topics however you can read my success letter "

Everyone here wishes all veterans success.

You being such an egotistical, know-it all, done-it all type of person, quick on the draw, easily angered - yea you sure as heck are showing some signs of PTSD.

But you continue to keep putting other vets down like your crap is soooo

much worse then theirs.

How about if before some of the men on your ship perished (no disrespect to any of them) --- How about if the night before one or two of your military buddies

stripped your clothes off - slamed you down on the deck and took some turns

at butt F*#^(n* you ! How'd you like that buddy - and then let me ask you just who the hell would you report them to and would you be believed ?

You are one ignorant, arrogant AZZ and I sure hope Mr. Walter doesn't come on here and spell check me -- but I think you understand what I have just said to you.

carliecarlie i have heard you need a hat on when you go to the bathroom so you will know what end to wipe,i can understand now why you are like you are wings will pray for you

[Guest anfrnkie]

I just found this on AO as well.

The Department of Veterans Affairs had provided special compensation for those who have become ill due to dioxin. Veterans who have chloracne, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, porphyria cutanea tarda, respiratory cancers, soft tissue sarcoma, acute and subacute peripheral neuropathy and prostate cancer could qualify for monthly payments. The VA does not require that veterans prove that they were harmed by dioxin. It is assumed all personnel who served in Vietnam have been exposed to it.

forever young,my letter is dated 7-18-06 comes from voro with ssoc ao might not have a up to date on va law the best thing you can do is call va tomorrow like i told you to do

[Tbird]

ok ok let's settle down and focus on the mission at hand giving invalid legal citations hurts veterans.

now let's do this

frank anyone you don't want to hear from put on your ignore list

anyone who doesn't want to hear from frank put him on your ignore list

let's get back to work, oh and please do not send me a he/she started it email

[Guest anfrnkie]

t-bird you are right,i only tried to state a new 38 hoe do i apply to ignore members

[Guest anfrnkie]

breta, i don,t think this is what i have from ssoc, this is new as stated on ssoc new 3;159,dept of va,assistance in developing claims,under paragraph c,could be satisfied by competent evideing post service treatment for a condition or other possible assocition with military serviceis

you are wrong that web page is nothing like i stated what you stated has to do with pensions you think just because you checked 38 part 3 you are way off base as you stated nothing new just because you state makes it true,if everyone takes your word for everything i fell sorry for them proves they can,t think for themselfs

[Guest anfrnkie]

hoppy thank you for reading my topic however this 3;159 is new has nothing to do with 30 or 40,breta looked up the wrong section 38 she states nothing new she is wrong,why is it so hard to get things across to you all my letter is dated 7-18 06 you people will always be at the same place because you don,t like change,i don,t care if no reads my topics i will just read all you members write to see how wrong you are