Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Anyone Receive A "fair" Decision The First Time?

Rate this question


AFMedic09

Question

I know everyone's ideas for what they feel they should be rated vary. I am just wondering if anyone has had to wait, but in the end received a fair rating? I am in the St. Pete RO, and am waiting. I tried to seach this topic, but couldn't find one. (Might be an ominous sign) Has everyone had to appeal their initial decision? Did you get a lower rating, but find that the justification was fair, and did not appeal? Just wondering....Thanks!!

1 John 4:9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It would do you good to take a look at the rating schedule for your disability and look for the rating that closely fits the residuals that your suffering. That way when you receive the decision letter from your claim you'll know if you was snowballed or not.

Some may argue this point, but, I think the % is higher than normal on the fact the initial decisions are appealed. Even if you think all your ducks are in a row, and should win this head over heals, and rightfully so, don't ever, ever think it's a done deal. To many hearts has been broken over this, and there wouldn't be if the VA would truly be honest. It is the utmost importance that you never ever give up, cause some day you will prevail.

Coot

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was released from active duty 1978.

Filed my first claim issues a couple months after separation - St Pete VARO

Some issues were Otitis Media,Hearing Loss,Tinnitus, Neck, Back, Right Shoulder,

Dizziness/Vertigo, Headaches, multiple concussions.

Oct 1978 - Everything denied under code 8.

I filed a disagreement.

Nov 1978 - VAMC admission with Grand Mal Seizures

Early1979 - all issues remain denied - although treatment shown on active duty

disabilities must be 10 % or more or not SC'd.

Otitis Media not suppurative at exam (no sheet - didn't bother to note I was on

antibiotics at the time for this condition), Mild spasms in neck, tender trigger points

right trapezius, record of concussions, headaches and blackouts on active duty

but no evidence of seizure activity on active duty.

All claims remain denied - Code 8.

I spent a week or 10 days here and there admitted into VAMC hospital

having grand mal seizures.

Submitted VAMC reports to RO with addendum to reopen all issues and add seizures to claim

and notice of Drivers License Revocation due to VAMC report to Tallahassee that I am now a seizure patient.

Sometime in 1979 - all issues remain denied.

Early 1980 -Had a seizure in a shower with glass sliding doors - fist went through sliding shower door

submitted request for laceration - scar and internal damage to wrist area.

Middle of 1980 - all issues denied.

I appealed the denial - BVA did not exist then, neither did law and order within the VA -

I was a peacetime vet - I was just sheet to the VA.

Had a RO Hearing before a panel of 5 members.

The head azz was the same adjudication officer that denied all of my claim issues.

The panel granted the issue for seizures DC 8910 SC - evaluation 40 % - effective date - day following separation.

8910 Epilepsy, grand mal. Rate under the general rating formula for major seizures.

At least 1 major seizure in the last 6 months or 2 in the last year; or averaging at least 5 to 8 minor seizures weekly . . . 40

The rating decision negated to mention or address anywhere in the findings - any of the other issues.

Finally around 2000 - RO granted SC for headaches - 10% - DC 8100 - effective date 1999.

I NOD the effective date - VA calls CUE on their prior decision - changes the diagnostic code

to DC 8045 - Brain trauma, which prohibits the 10% for headaches as I am already rated

for seizures - I have no dementia (9304) so subjective headaches at 10% can not be assigned

for a disability due to already rated due to Brain trauma (my seizures).

Under Diagnostic Code 8045, purely subjective complaints

(such as headache, dizziness, insomnia, etc.) recognized as

symptomatic of brain trauma will be evaluated as 10 percent

disabling and no more under 38 C.F.R. Part 4, Code 9304.

This 10 percent evaluation will not be combined with any

other evaluation for a disability due to brain trauma.

Anyway, BVA recently granted me 100 % P&T with SMC/S

back to 1999 or around there.

I am thankful for FINALLY getting my benefits -

but I don't have much love or confidence in the St Pete VARO.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am at the ST. Pete VARO and after 41 years I am still fighting for what I consider a correct decision. I should have been 100% from the day after I was discharged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I've been pretty lucky, but it depends on your point of view. All but two of my decisions were fair; the others are in appeal.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy Heck, Carlie!! I praise your tenacity!! If it were me, I'd have given up and be sitting with zilch just like the VA wanted. Thank God you stuck with it to get what you deserve. I can work, and I know many are worse off than I am. I have reviewed the schedules for ratings, and what I believe suits my symptoms. The rating I calculate is 60%, but I don't think that I will be rated according to my diseases and symptoms. I HOPE to be, but I hold little faith in the process.

1 John 4:9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I was discharged with 10% in 1971. I knew that was way too low, but I was physically pretty fit so I was able to go to school and function in society at a low level. Carlie started from less than zero just like some others here. I went for years without serious efforts to do much about my claim until the mid-80's when I got 30%. When I got fired in 2001 from my postal job I started to swing for the fences. I was angry that I was going to get thrown into the streets now that I had physical and mental health problems that would not allow me to find another job. By 2004 I had TDIU and SSD. Nothing like starvation looking you in the face to motivate you.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use