Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Results Ptsd Exam

Rate this question


SCAATY

Question

Picked up a copy of my C&P today and it's a joke. I knew it went bad but I didn't think it went this bad. I lied and all my problems are do to... any guesses? Drum roll please!!! BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER. According to the examineer I was never raped, and what happened to me at SERE school was not enough to justify a diagnosis of PTSD. She actually wrote the following. "The veteran could not give me any motive for the rape, and had no idea what happened to the woman that set him up." How the heck am I suppose to know what their motivation was or what happened to the (insert profanity) that set me up. I'm sorry but I didn't stay in touch with these people. 22 pages of garbage just like that. 30+ years I kept this to myself because I feared being called a lier. Man, this is going to take some time to digest.

Frustrating because I have been doing so much better the last few months, and because I went into the C&P exam feeling better about life it goes against me. I know I should send in a statement regarding this report but I don't know if I can fight the VA anymore. I think it's time to find a lawyer and just let them handle the whole thing.

I'm just plain disgusted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Getting a personality disorder DX from the VA is the house special. I would fight this thing. A borderline PD is the kiss of death like a sociopath PD. It is the garbage bag of psychiatric medical DX. When they want to &^%$ someone over this is the DX you get. On what did they base this DX?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCAATY,

I understand the frustration. I hope you don't give up on your claim. I would fight this, also. I had an inadequate exam in 2010, full of all sorts of assumptions, not from records, which was redone in 2012 with another C&P for the same issue. The new C&P was what the first should have been. I hope you stay with it!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have had C&P exams where they tried to sever my SC and dx me with a personality disorder. I have had them where they held my education againt me. The same exam doctor said I was using fraud because he said my stated symptoms fit the DX too well. This was because I had a degree in psychology. The guy just did not like me and tried to put that whammy on me. Where do they find these guys who are supposed to be in helping professions? Maybe they will be like Dr. Death the Texas forensic shrink to sent many people to death row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what ticked me off the most is that when she asked why it took so long for me to tell anyone about the rape. When I begain to explain that my son had been molested for years by a friend of his mother she asked if "my father had molested me," and when I answered no she replied "well, that usually runs in families." That is one of the main reasons I never told anyoine. I don't have a degree in psychology but I was a volunteer on the crisis line here in Reno. I was very good at it and after only a few weeks they put me on the payroll. They had a special team that dealt with rape victims and they wanted me to be on that team, but I didn't do it because I don't think I could have delt with it. Anyway, my point being that several times in the report she states "response style suggest a pathology greatly exagerated by a pyschologically naive person."

I've decided to send in a brief statement regaurding her completely inappropriate coment about molesting running in families, and point out two or three of the more serious inaccuracies. I am also going to put in the fact that the doctor that was going to do the exam went home due to illness, she had only just recieved my c-file, and had not had a chance to review it prior to the exam. Last year I had a c&p exam for my back and it was the same thing. My c-file was at another building and we had to wait until a courier to bring the file to her. Two out of four c&p exams I have had were conducted by individuals that had not reviewed my c-file prior to cunducting the exam. If that's not good grounds for an "inadequate exam" I don't know what is.

Ethan's grandma and John999 I will fight on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCAATY,

So glad to hear you will not give up!! Something I learned, though, and want to share...some will trip you up into giving more information than you need to, that is not even applicable!! Whatever you do, if you can, stay within information that applies to your time in service, whatever your issues are. They would like to make assumptions about how anything else just may be the contributing factor, even something that seems like innocently asked. Trust me...it's not that innocent!! I have walked a nightmare with my claim, one being some of the stunts, not even from facts gotten from me. In one of the denial letters, the attempt was to "backdate" a diagnosis, even as I'd never even been seen for anything relating to the timeframe, not for an evaluation, treatment, nor any diagnosis, not to mention I had been fine. Finally, it looks like my claim is at the end stage, but I could have avoided a lot of grief had I known about the truth. You can go through all the points in the C&P and rebut what does not apply, what you didn't say, what the evidence shows, etc., and request an adequate exam. It did take me two years to get one, but I did get scheduled for a thorough exam the second time around. Best of luck with your claim!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use