Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ssi Not Considered

Rate this question


chinavet

Question

Curious what you folks think:

As you know, cause you helped!, I was awarded 70% last year after 10 years of VA fumbles. They rated me at 30% ten years ago and slowly raised it though the years so that all my retro was eaten up by money they paid out in NSC Pension. They said they were unable to get Social Security data regarding my SSI which predated my NSC Pension.

So, I went in Novermber after recieving my award letter and asked the SS folks how to get verification that I was 100% disabled as a result of my now service connected condition. The lady at the desk typed me up a letter and I turned it in in January in hopes of IU or an increase.

Question is: Does this consitute a CUE? Can I get them to go back 10 years and now look at the fact that I was already government rated as 100%??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

So the fact the VA failed to get the SSI records is a failure in the VA's duty to assist. I know that " duty to assist" issues can't be part of a CUE. For instance, the VA fails to give you a C&P exam. That is a failure in the VA's duty to assist and not a CUE. This is what the VA told me and my lawyer anyway. If you have VA's records and the VA fails to get them is that also a failure in duty to assist? That would be enough for a regular appeal but not a CUE, correct? If the records are in the file and VA does not review them then that is a potential CUE.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I do not feel that in VBA's lack of consideration

of SSA info in the prior decision would rise to a CUE.

Reason - it would still always leave room for the weight

accorded by the decision maker.

In other words that information alone on it's own would not turn the decision.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You would be better served to get your hands on a couple of federal court cases that were overturned because the VA didnt get the SSDI records.

Also the SSDI disability condition must be the same condition your service conencted for.

There is no cue here as the decision is not final and there is no cue on duty to assist issues.

You need an attorney to help you.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree John999 :

“So the fact the VA failed to get the SSI records is a failure in the VA's duty to assist. I know that " duty to assist" issues can't be part of a CUE. For instance, the VA fails to give you a C&P exam. That is a failure in the VA's duty to assist and not a CUE. This is what the VA told me and my lawyer anyway. If you have VA's records and the VA fails to get them is that also a failure in duty to assist? “

Yes.

“That would be enough for a regular appeal but not a CUE, correct?”

Sure,if one is still in the appeal period.

“If the records are in the file and VA does not review them then that is a potential CUE.”

Yes, I cited 38 CFR 4.3 and 4.6 as a clear and unmistakable evidentiary error in my CUE claim.

But I succeeded on 3 other legal errors so I dont know if that type of CUE under 4.3 and 4.6 would work and VA didnt mention that in my decision.

Chinavet said “I was awarded 70% last year after 10 years of VA fumbles. “ Was that a TDIU award?

Are you still in the appeal period as you could potentially get a year additional retro with the SSDI records, by appealing this decision.

“They rated me at 30% ten years ago and slowly raised it though the years so that all my retro was eaten up by money they paid out in NSC Pension.”

If this was a continuously prosecuted claim, then you can appeal the most recent decision.

Did any decision over the years become unappealed?

If so that is the decision that could be cued. J Basser is right and I bet there are similar claims at US CAVC. When I get time I will search there.

Has the VA acknowledged the letter from SSA you gave them?

John said:

“If you can prove that the VA did not make a good faith effort to get your SSDI records you might have something, but I don't think it will be a CUE. I might be wrong so you could try. “

I agree that something is wrong when theVA does not get SSA records that are probative to a claim.

But VA must be fully aware these records exist and the vet must also sign an authorization form and send it to VA.

My husband's SSA records were critical to his SC claim , e signed the authoritization form 21—22,and the VA never even attempted to get them but told my Congressman the SSA refused to release them. It was BS. VA got them right away after I called SSA and found out they had lied.

wait hold that phone------------------------

'replying to ssi not considered'

was the SSA award a SSI award or a SSDI award?

SSI is not the same criteria as SSDI.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carlie

You know I think it is probably VA SOP to argue that unconsidered evidence is often amitted to by VA, but then branded as not be conclusive enough to have changed the outcome of the decision. This is what VA is saying in my CUE. They admit not considering my evidence, but then say it is not "undebatable" that this evidence would have changed the outcome of the original rating. This is a very large hole the VA can drive a truck through because they say "reasonable mind" (their minds) must agree that evidence for the vet is undebatable. You can debate almost anything except maybe speed of light or gravity. VA says that evidence of CUE must be objective, but the method they use to determine that is very subjective. Phrases like "reasonable minds" and "undebatable" are subjective unless you have a math problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank all of you so much!

I am in the appeal period and did turn in the documents needed for

an upgrade.

I will let them decide this upgrade. It has been in since 2010 and they've had all they need to

Rate it since January.

After they make a ruling I will decide whether or

Not to submit a CUE though it sounds like they will balk. After 12 years of this

I may just quit what feels like a part time job with the VA if my upgrade is

Approved

Thank you again. So glad I found you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use