Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied Again

Rate this question


frosty69

Question

I was denied again for Tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, bilateral otitis externa, and upper respiratory infection.

I have medical records in service to prove otitis externa, and upper respiratory infection, but that isn't good enough, and have suffer with UPI ever since, although, don't go to a doctor every time I have the symptoms, as I learned to live with them, and never even considered that I could get service connected for it, until about a year ago, hence no medical records, except at the VA, tinnitus in a coin toss, what I have read on the BVA site for veterans cases, some get approved and some don't with the same evidence I have, some if you have been in combat and around loud noises, they get granted, others get denied. Oh well, will be appealing all to the BVA anyway, what gets me, is that statement, no new eviedence, so claim is denied, trouble is they never look at all the evidence, hence keep submitting the same evidence until they learn to read it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest fla_viking

Dear Vike 17

Gilbert v. Derwinski set the standard requireing the VA to list evidence it finds to be persuasive or not. How ever in reality the VA still refuses to acknowlege key documents and argujents of veterans. I Belive the court to often accepts the VA interpitaon of the vets claim leaving the vet with unanswered isssues.

Terry Higgins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the answers, my biggest problems, is 99% of my SMR after basic training, according to VA doesn't exist, either the DOD or the VA lost them, at one point or another, as i keep getting denied for their mistakes. just because a veteran submits evidence and if someone doesn't comment on it, how does a person know, it was reviewed, for instance I filed a injury to my hand in 1971, as i had a finger sewn up at a Korean base In Vietnam, I got denied, as there wasn't no evidence in my SMR, but i asked the VA TO HELP ME GET IN TOUCH WITH MY CO, from Vietnam, they refused, so in 2002, thanks to the internet, I found him, he sent in a buddy letter, and I was approved for service-connection for my finger, but not back to 1971, just 2002, when I refiled, but have appealed, as for the URI, I have 6 documented times of going to a doctor in basic training, a 9 week period, including one night in the hospital, then in my denial they state 2, but not the overnight in the hospital, In Vietnam I was in the hospital for 9 days in august of 1969, again no SMR to prove anything, just one notation, in august of 1969, I had a temperature of 103.8, but no mention of being in hospital, not that i was packed in ice for 3 days, to bring temperature down, I can't remember any of my platoon people any more, and my CO, doesn't remember, as he was only the CO for 3 weeks at the time, and the VA can't find the morning reports either, so only proof I have is the letters to my mother, that mention, I was in the hospital for 9 days, I had a doctor at the VA, say my tinnitus and hearing problem is as likely as not to be service connected , as my MOS was heavy vehicles driver, and was in a lot of noise and combat situations, but the raters never mention this fact in their denials and they state the year 1963, when it was 1968, and have brought this to their attention twice, but they keep putting in 1963, for whatever reason, and a person can read very clearly 1968, not 1963, they have my birth date of 1946, so don't think I would be in the army then, as I was a senior in high school then. as for separate rating for hearing and otitis, yes is separate claim, at least in the cases I have read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

frosty69,

I noticed that you're 100% P&T. Just out of curiosity, what do you have to gain by trying to obtain sevice-connection for your hearing/ears. Hearing/ears would probably result in a 0% evaluation (unless you're really deaf) and 10% for tinnitus. Why bog down an already overburdened system. You probably wouldn't have anything to gain in this case. Unless your 100% hasn't passed the ten year mark for DIC.

As far as the UPI, depending what Diagnostic Code is assigned, I suppose there might be the possibility of receiving SMC due to further disability/ies reaching an additional 60% (If memeory serves me correctly, you are 100% for PTSD, correct?), but from what you have related here, obtaining service-connection will be pretty tough since there isn't any SMR's showing a chronic condition while in service, or anything since discharge.

Your best bet is to go and get a IMO, which should help your chances immensely in obtaining service-connection for upper respitory infection.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vike17

yes, I am 100% P&T, only a little over 8 years now, but have rated with PTSD for 22 years now. What do I have to gain, I feel a lot, as the more things service-connected the better chance my wife, has of getting DIC. yes, AM ALMOST DEAF, AND HAVE BEEN FOR MANY YEARS, AS i FEEL I would get at least 10%, and I feel it should go back to 1971, when I filed my first claim, as the VA didn't look at all the evidence, plus they took another veterans hearing test as mine, basically the VA is saying my hearing got better after 2 years in the army, with one in Vietnam, which any doctor will tell you is impossible, as the ear test said it was done in fort snelling, in st Paul, MN, have never been there in my life, plus it has the wrong social security number on the report, that is why I am fighting the hearing test, As for bogging down the system, that is not my fault, that is the administration, and all the cutbacks, plus being in a war, that is worst then Vietnam, and never will be won. yes am trying for smc, aid and attendance/housebound. all together have 22 claims going right now, started with 25, a few years back, have won three, and hope to win at least 1/2 of them, with 4 going back to 1971. so yes a lot of back pay if I can win, if not, all I am is wasting is time, and that is of no matter, as I seldom leave the house, except for doctor appointment, I was low balled on rating for a dozen years, and was never told anything, about that a veteran could appeal for higher rating, I was drafted at age 21, with 3 pre-service disabilities, and to my way of thinking, they wanted me so bad, then they are going to pay for their mistakes. A veteran told me on hadit a couple of years back, that a veteran should file a claim for anything that you, yourself, feels was aggravated by the service, or for any injury/illness that you have, file then try to prove, and that is exactly what I am doing, as who knows at the months and years go by, maybe you will find a buddy to prove the claim, then you will be glad, you filed years earlier, and if not, then you will be dead, and nothing else matters anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I feel it should go back to 1971, when I filed my first claim, as the VA didn't look at all the evidence, plus they took "

Frosty- I think Nam vets PTSD comp should go back to the day they first stepped foot in Nam-

but that wont fly with the VA.

Only a CUE claim can get retro in a case like this- and remember the Bell Decision at CAVC etc- restricted many BVA CUEs on evidence only back to July 1992, due to the constructive notice crapola as found within Bell as within M21-1 and

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:Zh7hN...=1&ie=UTF-8

Also- final RO decisions that were later subsumed by the BVA cannot be CUed at the RO-they are immune and can only be collaterally attacked only at the BVA -if the subsumed decision contained CUE.

Also- the fact of CUE- does not mean that the 1992 Bell ruling prohibits succeeding in a CUE claim-

beyond the 1992 date-

Example: Look V Derwinski- 1992 CAVC decision on Cue back to 1962 (1151 issues prejudiced the VA- sounds like mine too)

Myler- 1991- Cue found back to 1953- failure to assign rating for documented disability (one of my CUES is like this one)

Bentley V Derwinski- 1990 -CUE ifound in 1960 rating decision.( wrong DC code and rating to detriment of vet's comp rating.)

Akins V Derwinski 1991 ---service connect based on aggravation due to documented increase inservice to disability was denied, and CUE had been committed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta

Yes, that is what I did, I sent in claim for my back, my hearing and a EED for my hand injury claimiong cue, on account of not looking at all evidence, looking at another veterans hearing results, and refusual to help me find witnesses, as back in them days, didn't have the internet to help locate people like everyone has nowadays, no more money for hand, but I am service-connected at 0%, after the VA basically calling me a liar for 32 years, by stating, I didn't injured my hand in vietnam, as it wasn't in my SMR, but they don't take into account, that between the VA System and the DOD, they lost most of my records after basic, that is why I shove paper work up their behind, as much as I can, people treat me decent, I do the same, they treat me as a second class citizen, then it is war, all over again. yes, I know I have a shitty attitude, but was trained by the best, the VA SYSTEM. thanks for all them cases, will have to read up on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use